Three listed-building homes at The Barn Hotel West End Road, Ruislip

“Proposal: Listed Building Consent for the partial demolition of Grade II Listed Building and conversion of the two listed buildings from hotel (C1 Use Class) to accommodate three residential dwellings (C3 Use Class) (LBC linked to planning application reference 7969/APP/2024/2451 for the redevelopment of the remainder of the site). (A mended plans 24/04/26)”

“The application seeks Listed Building consent for the partial demolition and conversion of existing Grade II Listed Buildings from hotel (C1 Use Class) to accommodate three residential dwellings (C3 Use Class). The proposed plans indicate that the later additions to the two Grade II Listed Buildings would be demolished and a new lightweight extension is proposed to the Leaning Barn and Oak Room.”

“The application site, as outlined in red in Figure 1 below, measures 0.96 hectares in area and comprises the former ‘Barn Hotel’ (now closed) with several buildings. It is situated to the south of Ruislip station, where a public footpath to the north offers connection via stairs, and to the east of West End Road. Within the centre of the site are Grade II Listed Buildings consisting of Sherley's Farmhouse, the Leaning Barn and the Oak Room.”

“The northern part of the site adjacent to the Metropolitan Underground line is occupied by two buildings that are arranged in long blocks ("I" and "T" blocks). These provided the main accommodation for the hotel. The listed farmhouse, shown in Figure 2 below, were also used for accommodation purposes.”

“Of particular relevance is a listed building application referenced 7969/APP/2023/1833 which was consented on 2 October 2023 for the following similar development:”

“However, this 2023 Listed Building Consent was associated with the Full Planning Application referenced 7969/APP/2023/1473 for:”

“In respect of the listed building consent application, it is acknowledged that the works proposed to facilitate the conversion of the buildings would result in some harm to the fabric of the listed buildings, however, subject to the recommended conditions, it is considered that the degree of harm to the buildings would be satisfactorily minimised.”

“In terms of public benefits, the proposal would support the long-term retention and repair of the listed buildings though a viable reuse for residential. In addition, the removal of the later intrusive modern extensions/additions would be beneficial to the preservation of the heritage assets, by helping to better reveal their significance, historic fabric and form.”

“No objection – in particular they are supportive of the proposal, considering that the application presents a good solution for the site from a heritage perspective and recommend that the Council should approve this application as any harm to significance would be limited and could be balanced favourably by the wider heritage benefits that the proposals could deliver. They recommended securing the listed building works.”

“No objection subject to conditions and a planning obligation is secured to ensure that the approved works are undertaken to the historic buildings and that they are restored so that the heritage benefits of the scheme are realised.”

“A total of 122 no. letters were sent to neighbouring properties, site notices were displayed and an advert was posted in the local paper. The original neighbour consultation process expired on 25 th October 2024 and 11 objections were received from residents. The Ruislip Residents' Association (RRA), and the Ruislip, Northwood and Eastcote Local History Society also submitted letters of objection.”

“Following receipt of full amended drawings and reports in 2026, full re- advertisement was carried with all neighbouring properties previously notified, along with those who previously objected, whilst amended site notices were posted and the application was re -advertised in the local newspaper. The neighbour consultation process expired on 2 nd June 2026 and 7 objections were received .”

“Members referred to the comments received from Historic England and sought clarification on how the Council would ensure that demolition, restoration and construction works were undertaken appropriately and that the listed buildings were properly safeguarded throughout the development process. Members also asked whether Historic England would have any ongoing involvement in monitoring the works.”

“Members asked what safeguards were in place to ensure that the approved restoration works to the listed buildings would be completed and not left unfinished whilst the wider residential development proceeded. Officers advised that the matter was addressed within the proposed Section 106 Heads of Terms. These requirements would ensure that the restoration and repair of the listed buildings were completed prior to the completion of Blocks A to C within the wider development.”

“Officers’ recommendations were moved, seconded and when put to a vote, unanimously agreed.”