Mixed-use estate redevelopment at Farnham and Hilldene Estate, Romford

“The Committee considered a planning application for the comprehensive redevelopment of the Harold Hill District Centre and demolition of existing buildings and structures. The application forms part of the Havering’s ’12 Estates’ regeneration strategy. The application follows the recent approvals for the Family Welcome Centre on the northern side of Hilldene Avenue and…”

“The scheme proposes the demolition of the existing centre where the Harold Hill Library will be retained and for the redevelopment to deliver up to 481 homes, between 6,204 sqm and 6,504 sqm maximum (GEA) of flexible commercial and community floorspace, public and private open space, highways improvements, landscaping and other benefits.”

“Members reviewed the detailed graphics presented and expressed concern about the potential loss of valuable spaces within the scheme. It was noted that the development is heavily residential with limited commercial provision, raising questions about the viability of a mixed-use centre. Concerns were also raised regarding the lack of supporting infrastructure, particularly the absence of secondary school provision, which represents a missed opportunity to address local needs.”

“Further comments highlighted the need for larger family homes, as the current proposal includes a significant number of smaller units, which may create long-term challenges for future generations. Members also noted the prevalence of single-aspect dwellings, which could lead to poor ventilation and limited natural light, impacting the quality of living conditions. While some dual-aspect units were acknowledged, concerns remained about the overall design quality.”

“Members raised two major concerns regarding the proposed scheme. The first related to the bulk and height of the blocks along Farnham Avenue, which were considered too high and potentially causing overshadowing. It was suggested that further work may be needed to reduce building heights and address overshadowing impacts within the outline design. The second concern focused on parking provision.”

“Members welcomed the relocation of the public house within the scheme, noting its importance as a community hub. However, they reiterated the need for careful consideration of parking impacts and requested that these concerns be addressed in future design stages.”

“Following the debate, the Committee resolved to grant planning permission subject to completion of a legal agreement or unilateral undertaking whichever is the appropriate legal mechanism pursuant to Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) and all other enabling powers to secure the planning obligations detailed in the report. And one additional condition on noise and ventilation.”

“The vote for approval, was carried by 5 votes in favour to 1 abstention. Councillor Ray Best abstained from the vote.”