Flood defence wall at 16, 17 and 18 Langstone High Street, Havant

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Havant Planning Committee on 25 Jun 2026.

APP/25/00179Approved

What was proposed

The application proposed a glass-topped flood defence wall along the harbour-side footpath, with existing stone paving lifted and reinstated.

“APP/25/00179 (16, 17, 18 Langstone High Street)”

“The proposal in relation to Nos. 16, 17 and 18 Langstone High Street comprises works affecting the existing harbour-side footpath, which runs directly along the frontage of the listed buildings and forms part of their curtilage. The works involve the construction of a new, glass topped flood defence wall to the seaward edge of the footpath, with the existing stone-flag surfacing temporarily lifted and reinstated following construction.”

Officer report

The site

The site comprises three Grade II listed residential properties fronting directly onto the existing harbour-side footpath beside Chichester Harbour.

“The Royal Oak Public House - a historic public house fronting directly on the existing harbour-side footpath.”

Officer report

Planning history

No recent planning history was recorded for Nos. 17 or 18, while earlier listed building applications related to No. 16.

“No. Langstone High Street – APP/17/00929 - Listed Building Consent for proposed Garden Room extension with roof terrace above (retaining previous proposals as approved). (Approved 18.09.18 under appeal APP/X1735/Y/18/3196024) Request to…”

“There is no recent planning history for either No. 17 or 18 Langstone High Street.”

Officer report

Officers’ recommendation

Officers recommended approval because the works caused low-level less than substantial harm, outweighed by flood protection and heritage benefits.

“The proposed construction of a glass topped, flood defence wall along the seaward edge of the footpath, as set out in paragraph 3.4, would result in a low level of less than substantial harm, arising from an alteration to the openness and character of the harbour-side curtilage.”

“When the public benefits set out above in para 7.5, are weighed against the low level of less than substantial harm to the setting of the building, it is considered that that the benefits outweigh the harm and provide clear and convincing justification for granting consent.”

Officer report

Conservation advice

The Conservation Officer raised no objection, subject to conditions protecting and sensitively reinstating the existing stone-flag paving.

“APP/25/00179 – 16, 17 and 18 Langstone High Street 5.6 The Conservation Officer advises that the proposals would result in a low level of less than substantial harm to the significance of Nos. 16, 17 and 18 Langstone High Street. The harm arises from the attachment of a new flood defence wall to the outer edge of the historic harbour-side footpath, resulting in a subtle change to the currently open and unenclosed character of the curtilage.”

“However, the proposals would not result in the loss of historic fabric, and the existing stone-flag paving would be retained and reinstated. The works would not affect the architectural interest, legibility or appreciation of the listed buildings. As such, no objection is raised, subject to conditions.”

Officer report

Residents’ views

One objection raised concerns about outlook, noise, privacy, deliveries and pedestrian safety; two supporters backed the scheme after the 2024 flood.

“Objection: • The proposed flood gates will be imposing on the outlook from front facing windows. • The proposed glass wall will result in increased noise and loss of privacy due to visitors sitting on it. • Increase of delivery vehicles for the Royal Oak PH using Langstone High Street…”

“Support proposals in light of damaging flood in 2024. • Should the barrier be topped, water should not be trapped in nearby foundations and piling should not damage nearby properties including listed buildings. • Access to listed cottages should remain in place. • Pre/post construction surveys should be undertaken on individual properties and insurance provided against any potential damage from construction. • How will works to the footpath be carried out?”

Officer report

The committee’s decision

The committee authorised the Interim Head of Planning to grant listed building consent for the application, subject to conditions.

“APP/25/00179 (No’s 16, 17, 18 Langstone High Street)”

“That the Interim Head of Planning be authorised to GRANT LISTED BUILDING CONSENT for application APP/25/00179, subject to the conditions set out below (subject to such changes and/or additions that the Interim Head of Planning, in consultation with the Chairman of Planning Committee, considers necessary to impose prior to the issuing of the decision), and having regard to the statutory duty under Section 16 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990.”

Minutes

Conditions on the consent

Works must follow the approved plans, and details for lifting, protecting, reinstating or replacing the historic paving must be approved first.

“Notwithstanding the approved drawings, no works affecting the existing footpath forming the front curtilage of Nos 16, 17 and 18 Langstone High Street shall commence until a schedule of works is prepared comprising full details of the lifting, storage, protection and reinstatement of the flagstones have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.”

“The works shall thereafter be carried out fully in accordance with the approved details. Reason: To ensure that any replacement materials preserve the character and appearance of the historic curtilage and safeguard the special architectural and historic interest of the listed building, in accordance with Section 16 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Havant Planning Committee minutes, 25 June 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Havant's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Havant
Date
Thursday 25 June 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

25 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →