Specialist accommodation conversion at 62, 62 Roxborough Park, Harrow
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Harrow Planning Committee on 23 Jul 2025.
What was proposed
The application sought conversion of a nine-bedroom care home into 11-bedroom specialist accommodation, with a rear extension and external alterations.
“Change of use from a 9 bedroom Care Home (Class C2) to an 11-bedroom specialist accommodation unit (Sui Generis); single storey rear extension; external alterations (demolition of rear extension).”
Officer report
The site and its setting
The vacant, boarded-up two-storey property had parking at the front, wild vegetation at the rear, and was in an area with mixed commercial and residential uses.
“To the front of the site, there is hardstanding for vehicular parking and the rear amenity space is given over to wild vegetation.”
“The character of the area is a mix of commercial and residential uses.”
Officer report
Earlier site uses
Earlier permissions allowed a group home for people with learning difficulties and a hostel with forecourt parking.
“Ref no. Description Status and date of decision WEST/45575/9 2/FUL Change of use from Class C3 residential to Class C2 to an 8- person group home for people with learning difficulties.”
“WEST/44284/9 2/FUL Change of use from residential home (Class C2) to hostel (Class C1) with forecourt parking.”
Officer report
Why officers supported it
Officers considered the proposal suitable for supporting women and children, with acceptable effects on design, neighbours, highways, parking and flooding, subject to conditions.
“2) Grant planning permission subject to the Conditions listed in Appendix 1 of this report.”
“The proposed development complies with all relevant land use policies by providing a suitable accommodation to support women and children. The proposed development is also considered to be acceptable on grounds of character and design, it is considered to have an acceptable residential amenity impact, it is considered acceptable on grounds of highways safety, parking, and furthermore the site is not considered to be susceptible to harmful flooding and would not unduly…”
Officer report
Consultation and objections
Four responses objected on public safety, overcrowding, residential amenity, antisocial behaviour, works, parking, fire safety and waste grounds, while consultees raised no objection subject to matters being addressed.
“The site is unsuitable for the proposed use on public safety grounds • Overcrowding of the property considering the number of residents the proposed change of use is meant to accommodate. • Negative impact on neighbouring residential amenity • The development will exacerbate existing antisocial behaviour in the area.”
“Officer Comment: • There is no evidence to suggest the proposed development would increase antisocial behaviour in the area. • The property has an internal floor area of 358sqm, all proposed bedrooms and internal spaces are well appointed and meet national and local minimum standards. • An extension is proposed as part of the development which would be of an appropriate scale.”
Officer report
Safeguards on the use
The permission includes controls on cycle and refuse storage, fire safety, security, management, resident numbers and the type of accommodation.
“REASON: To ensure the satisfactory provision of safe cycle storage facilities, to provide facilities for all the users of the site and in the interests of highway safety and sustainable transport, in accordance with policy T5 of The London Plan 2021 and policy DM 42 of the Harrow Development Management Policies.”
“1) identify suitably positioned unobstructed outside space: a) for fire appliances to be positioned on b) appropriate for use as an evacuation assembly point 2) is designed to incorporate appropriate features which reduce the risk to life and the risk of serious injury in the event of a fire; including appropriate fire alarm systems and passive and active fire safety measures 3) is constructed in an appropriate way to minimise the risk of fire spread 4) provide suitable and…”
Officer report
The committee’s decision
The committee granted planning permission subject to the officer report’s conditions, and the approval was unanimous.
“DECISION: GRANTED subject to the conditions set out in the Officer’s report.”
Minutes
Sources
- Harrow Planning Committee minutes, 23 July 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Harrow's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Harrow Planning Committee
- Council
- Harrow
- Date
- Wednesday 23 July 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- Unanimous
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Harrow committee decisions →
This committee's year
8 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.