Detached townhouse repositioning at Redevelopment Of Elm Hatch Elm Hatch, Harlow

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Harlow Development Management Committee on 10 Sept 2025.

HW/REMVAR/25/00237Approved

What was proposed

The application sought to move the approved single house about 2.5 metres west, creating a detached house instead of an end terrace.

“This section 73 minor material amendment application proposes the re-positioning of the single house approved under planning permission HW/FUL/23/00331 approximately 2.5m west of its approved position / away from the shared party wall with the existing terrace of houses.”

“The proposal would result in the provision of a detached house instead of an end terraced house.”

Officer report

The site

Elm Hatch is divided between western vacant and retail land and eastern garage land beside terraced houses, with a church and study-centre path nearby.

“Elm Hatch (“the site”) is located approximately 1.2km south-east of Harlow town centre. The site is split into two parts on St Andrew’s Meadow. The western section of the site contains the redundant and vacant land which previously sited The Hummingbird Pub, and the two retail units and associated car park. The eastern section of the site relates to the garage block abutting the terraced houses to the east.”

“The entire site is bound by Waterhouse Moor to the south (including no.144), a row of terraced houses to the east, the Church of St Andrew to the north (which has been repurposed as the Harlow Study Centre) and a path which leads to the Harlow Study Centre to the west.”

Officer report

Planning history

The wider redevelopment was approved in December 2023, following earlier applications for demolition, development, a restaurant and temporary retail units.

“App Number Proposal Status Decision Date HW/DEM/16/00429 Demolition of the Hummingbird, Elm Hatch. Prior Approval not Required 29/11/2016 HW/FUL/18/00246 Development of Elm Hatch and adjacent garage area to create 2no. retail units, 4no. 2 bedroom mobility flats, 1no. 3 bedroom semi-detached house and the creation of off street parking provision in surrounding streets.”

“Approved 12/12/2023 HW/FUL/24/00442 Installation of modular retail units to provide temporary trading space for the Convenience Store for the duration of the development works associated with planning application reference HW/FUL/23/00331 Approved 14/03/2025 HW/CND/25/00057 Application for approval of details reserved by condition 5 (Construction Management Plan), condition 6 (Construction Ecological Management Plan) & condition 7 (Bat Roost Inspections) of planning…”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval because the amendment was acceptable in design, would not harm residential amenity, and left the other approved development unchanged.

“The Principle of Development of the residential/retail development has previously been accepted with the approval of application HW/FUL/23/00331 and the principle therefore remains acceptable.”

“Other than the re-positioning of the single house all other elements of the approved HW/FUL/23/00331 development remain unchanged and acceptable.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Arboricultural, urban design, heritage, and waste officers raised no objection to the amended position and its effects.

“Following a site visit to assess any potential arboricultural constraints on the 30 th of June 2025, it is evident that the proposed changes to the development will not have an impact upon adjacent trees and other vegetation. Therefore, this application of variation on the development can be considered for consent without further arboricultural involvement.”

“The Council’s Waste and Recycling team were consulted on the amended house position and associated re-positioning of the refuse and recycling bins and do not object to the change.”

Officer report

Objections received

Two objections concerned the house’s description, height, privacy, sunlight, drainage and flooding; officers said the amendment would not cause those harms.

“- Concerned that the house is now a ‘townhouse’ - Concerned that the proposed house is higher and this will result in loss of privacy - Loss of sunlight concerns - Drainage/Flooding concerns…”

“The reference to the single house as a ‘townhouse’ does not mean that an additional storey / height has been added, this is just a descriptive term used by the applicant. No additional openings are proposed that might result in overlooking/loss of privacy. The objector’s properties are to the south of the proposed house and therefore no loss of sunlight will arise as a result of the proposed amendment.”

Officer report

Committee decision

The committee granted planning permission for the application, subject to the conditions in the report.

“The Committee received a report and application HW/REMVAR/25/00237 at Elm Hatch for a variation to condition 30 (Approved Plans) of planning permission HW/FUL/23/00331 for an amendment to the position of the single townhouse located on east side of the site to be positioned circa 2.5m away from neighbouring property.”

“RESOLVED that planning permission be GRANTED subject to the conditions in the report.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Harlow Development Management Committee minutes, 10 September 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Harlow's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Harlow
Date
Wednesday 10 September 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

5 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →