Police headquarters redevelopment at Surrey County Constabulary Police Headquarters Mount Browne, Sandy Lane

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Guildford Planning Committee on 9 Sept 2025.

24/P/00564Approved

What was proposed

The application proposed redeveloping the police headquarters, replacing operational buildings and the dog school, refurbishing buildings, and providing parking, landscaping and related works.

“The proposal is for the redevelopment of Mount Browne headquarters including demolition of existing dog school and operational policing buildings and development of replacement dog school with associated staff accommodation, replacement core operational police buildings, ground maintenance compound and refurbishment of core operational building including courtyard wing, old building and sports building.”

“The proposed dog school accommodation building would be set over two storeys with twenty bedrooms for visiting staff. It would be located with the south of the dog school, and measure 20.3m in length and 13.9m in width. The dog school accommodation would be 7.5m in height above the ground floor entrance level.”

Officer report

The site and its setting

The headquarters covers 14.35 hectares within a wooded, sloping campus, with parts in the Green Belt and the whole site in the Surrey Hills National Landscape.

“In terms of designations, a large part of the site has been removed from the Green Belt in light of the fact that it has been allocated in the Local Plan. This will be discussed in greater detail later in the report. The remainder of the site, which is outside the allocation, is within the Green Belt. The entire site is within the Surrey Hills National Landscape (SHNL) (formerly Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty) and Area of Great Landscape Value (AGLV).”

“The campus contains a large number of buildings which have been constructed mainly over the last 70 years since the site has been occupied by Surrey Police. These range from single to three storey structures which house the operational buildings used by staff. There is no longer any residential accommodation on the site. There are also a number of formal and informal car parking areas spread access the campus to accommodate the large vehicle presence on the site.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval because substantial policing, staff, dog-school, environmental and transport benefits clearly outweighed identified harms.

“However, the benefits of the scheme are substantial and wide ranging. The scheme would deliver high quality facilities to meet the ongoing operational needs of the Police as well as for staff retention and well-being. The proposal would enable the ongoing operation of a world-renowned dog school. Combined these two benefits would enable easier access to communities to ensure they are kept safe and maintain community confidence in the Policing service.”

“Notwithstanding certain identified conflicts with relevant development plan policies above, overall the proposal accords with the development plan read as a whole. It is considered that other material considerations include harms and benefits resulting from the proposal scheme. Overall, the benefits clearly outweigh the harms, and in particular the benefit of improved police response times.”

Officer report

What members discussed

Members asked whether the updated higher flood risk created a practical threat, and officers confirmed that the drainage strategy remained sufficient.

“An updated flood risk assessment had been submitted, confirming that the original drainage strategy remained effective and would mitigate the identified risks. The sequential test previously carried out also remained valid, as there were no other reasonably suitable alternative sites for the proposed development. Officers further confirmed that the introduction of the concept of “grey belt” in the revised NPPF did not alter the Green Belt assessment already undertaken.”

“Members sought clarification on whether the higher flood risk posed any practical threat to the development. Officers confirmed that the drainage strategy was sufficient to address the additional risk, and therefore the proposals remained acceptable.”

Minutes

The committee vote

The Chair’s motion to follow the officer recommendation was seconded and carried, with the recorded vote showing 14 members for.

“The Chair moved the officer recommendation, seconded by Councillor Williams, which was carried.”

Minutes

The decision

The committee recommended approval, subject to a Section 106 agreement covering biodiversity monitoring and landscaping, followed by conditions in the report.

“RESOLVED: That; i. Delegated authority be granted to the Assistant Director of Planning to grant permission and make minor amendments to the wording of conditions subject to the applicant entering into a Section 106 Agreement to secure: • Monitoring of onsite Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG) • Implementation of the proposed landscaping ii.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Guildford Planning Committee minutes, 9 September 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Guildford's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Guildford
Date
Tuesday 9 September 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

18 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →