Office building redevelopment at 1 Thistle Street, New Town, Edinburgh
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee on 5 Nov 2025.
What was proposed
The application proposed upgrading and extending an existing office building, replacing its link structure, adding rooftop space and replacing car parking with cycle facilities.
“The application is to retrofit and upgrade the existing Class 4 office building, including the redevelopment of the Link Structure between the Thistle Street Building and listed Queen Street Building, and erection of rooftop extensions to provide additional office accommodation and external amenity space at the upper levels. At the lower levels, the internal car parking will be replaced with cycle parking and other ancillary facilities, including welfare.”
“The basement of the Thistle Street building will include cycle parking and welfare facilities which can be accessed directly via the access ramp or internally. The welfare facilities have separate showers and changing areas, including include one unisex and one accessible changing room with a private shower in each.”
Officer report
Planning history
There was no relevant site history, although pre-application discussions took place.
“Relevant Site History No relevant site history.”
“Pre-application discussions took place on this application.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended permission because the scheme would provide sustainable, high-quality office redevelopment, comply with the development plan and preserve heritage assets.
“The sustainable redevelopment of this office building will ensure that it remains fit for purpose and will contribute positively to the city's prime office supply, in a highly accessible location.”
“Overall, the development is in accordance with the development plan. The revised scheme will deliver a sustainable, high quality and well-designed development which will enliven and activate the north-west corner of St Andrew Square. The proposals include design features that will contribute to climate mitigation and adaptation, as well as encouraging biodiversity.”
Officer report
Heritage and design assessment
The increased height and massing would be noticeable, but officers considered the design, materials and wider townscape context would avoid harmful effects.
“The proposed development will also have a neutral impact on the immediate setting of the category A listed buildings at the corner of Queen Street and North St David Street - see Viewpoint 2a). This view is already characterised by taller structures rising behind the pastiche façade of the Queen Street Building.”
“Within the current townscape context, the proposed increased height and massing will have an impact on the setting of this category A listed building. However, this impact will not be harmful due to the carefully considered design elements as detailed above.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
Consultees raised heritage concerns about height and stepping down, while other consultees reported no objections subject to conditions or contributions.
“The existing building is already tall. The proposals would raise the height and massing in the north-west corner of St Andrew Square to above the level of the neighbouring block to the south (Standard Life and Ibis). It would impose a taller building on a site where the topography is already falling to the north down North St David St, and a step- down in scale and height would be expected.”
“While HES welcomes this small reduction in height, although still considers that further design changes are necessary to reduce the impacts to an acceptable level. HES's initial concerns on the increased height on the site, reduction in the stepping down along North St David St and the sheer facades to the new storeys remain.”
Officer report
Public views
Seven objections, one neutral comment and one supporting comment addressed height, massing, design, heritage, office use, parking and climate matters.
“Two representation periods occurred, firstly in July for the original scheme and secondly in September for the amended scheme. A total of nine public representations were received, plus a single anonymous comment which cannot be accepted. These comprise seven objections, including from the New Town and Broughton Community Council, one neutral comment from Edinburgh World Heritage, and one supporting comment, summarised as follows:”
“− concern for the scale and massing in the surrounding context − concern that the extension overwhelms the building − impact on the surrounding area, setting, key views, and World Heritage Site − the design and materials do not match the surrounding area − the design has blank frontages to the street…”
Officer report
The committee decision
The committee granted planning permission subject to the stated conditions, reasons, informatives and legal agreement.
“25/03183/FUL – Report by the Chief Planning Officer To GRANT planning permission subject to the conditions, reasons, informatives and a legal agreement as set out in section C of the report by the Chief Planning Officer.”
Minutes
Conditions and agreement
Permission was subject to conditions covering contamination, archaeology, materials, lighting, landscaping, ventilation and a legal agreement for tram and public realm contributions.
“The development to which this permission relates must be begun not later than the expiration of three years beginning with the date on which this permission is granted. If development has not begun at the expiration of this period, the planning permission lapses.”
“Planning permission shall not be issued until a suitable legal agreement has been concluded to secure the following contributions: − the sum of £157,749 towards the Edinburgh Tram. − the sum of £263,007 towards City Centre Public Realm Improvements.”
Officer report
Sources
- Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee minutes, 5 November 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Edinburgh's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Edinburgh
- Date
- Wednesday 5 November 2025
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Edinburgh committee decisions →
This committee's year
126 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.