Short-term let accommodation at 6 Abbey Mount, Abbeyhill, Edinburgh
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee on 27 May 2026.
What was proposed
Retrospective permission was sought to change a residential flat into short-term let accommodation, which the applicant said began in January 2017.
“Retrospective planning permission is sought for the change of use from a residential flatted dwelling to a short term let (STL). The applicant indicates on the application form that the STL use began on 01 January 2017.”
“The applicant has provided an economic report and a supporting planning statement.”
Officer report
The site
The one-bedroom ground-floor flat is in a small private cul-de-sac and adjoins two residential properties, including the flat above.
“This application relates to a one-bedroom ground floor flatted property. It comprises a living room, kitchen/dining, one bedroom, and a bathroom and is entered via a private garden and door to the front. The application property adjoins two neighbouring residential properties with this including the property directly above on the first floor of the property and adjoining at the rear wall of the property, at 5 Abbey Mount.”
“The property is set within a private cul-de-sac with a gated entrance adjacent to the main thoroughfare of Abbey Mount. The cul-de-sac is small and serves access to a mix of commercial and residential including the two-storey residential building the application property forms part of, two commercial garages situated approximately 15 metres to the east of the application property and the rear entrance of 11 STL units (Abbey Gate) located around…”
Officer report
Earlier applications
Earlier applications for short-term let use and a certificate of lawfulness were refused, and an appeal upheld refusal concerning loss of housing.
“24/02429/CLESTL 6 Abbey Mount Edinburgh EH8 8EJ Application for the issue of a Certificate of Lawfulness confirming its existing use and a short-term let visitor accommodation. Refused 28 January 2025”
“23/03614/FULSTL was refused and appealed to the Local Review Body (LRB) on 24 April 2024. The LRB upheld the officer's recommendation due to the loss of residential accommodation and removed the reason for refusal relating to Hou 7 in respect of Inappropriate Uses in Residential Areas.”
Officer report
Officers’ recommendation
Officers recommended refusal because the use would harm neighbouring amenity, remove residential accommodation and provide insufficient economic justification.
“It is recommended that this application be Refused subject to the details below.”
“The change of use of this property to a short-term let (STL) will have an unacceptable impact on neighbouring amenity. The loss of the residential accommodation has not been justified. Whilst it is recognised that there is an economic benefit to the city as a whole from the provision of tourist accommodation in this case it does not outweigh the adverse impact on residential amenity or loss of residential accommodation.”
Officer report
Main planning concerns
Visitors, servicing and guest behaviour were expected to create disturbance, while the claimed economic benefits did not outweigh losing a home.
“The application property has a private garden ground to the front which is overlooked by the neighbouring residential unit above. This private garden may be used by STL guests in a manner dissimilar to that of permanent residents and the STL use would introduce an increased frequency of movement to and from the property, enabling visitors to arrive and stay at the property for a short period of time on a regular basis throughout the year in a manner also dissimilar to that…”
“To comply with the policy, it is not sufficient to demonstrate that the STL use will deliver economic benefits; rather, it must be demonstrated that the economic benefits associated with any individual application are significant enough that they warrant the loss of a home, and the economic and other benefits associated with this.”
Officer report
Public views
There were 23 supporting representations and one objection, covering amenity, residential loss, licensing compliance, the mixed-use setting and economic benefits.
“- Loss of residential accommodation. - Negative impact on residential amenity. - Property shares access and common space with other residential properties.”
“- The STL use complies with the licensing requirements. - No negative impact on residential amenity. - The property is located in a busy mixed-use area, therefore, STL use is acceptable. - Positive economic benefit.”
Officer report
The committee’s decision
Planning permission was refused for the reasons set out in section C of the officer’s report.
“25/02313/FULSTL - Report by the Chief Planning Officer To REFUSE planning permission for the reasons set out in section C of the report by the Chief Planning Officer. 4.4 – Flat 2, 1 Allanfield, Hillside…”
Minutes
Councillors at the meeting
- Hal OslerChairLib Dem
- Max MitchellVice-ChairConservative
- Chas BoothGreen
- Christopher CowdyConservative
- Joan GriffithsLabour
- David KeySNP
- Euan DavidsonLib Dem
- Martha Mattos CoelhoSNP
- Amy McNeese-MechanSNP
- Tim PogsonLabour
- Alex StaniforthGreen
Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.
Sources
- Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee minutes, 27 May 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Edinburgh's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Edinburgh
- Date
- Wednesday 27 May 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended refusal
- Committee decided
- Refused
- Councillors
- 11SNP 3Conservative 2Green 2Labour 2Lib Dem 2Show councillors
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Edinburgh committee decisions →
This committee's year
251 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 5 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.