Short-term let accommodation at Flat 2 4 Old Assembly Close, Edinburgh
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee on 6 Aug 2025.
What was proposed
The application sought retrospective permission to change a residential flat into short-term let accommodation, with no internal or external alterations.
“The change of use of the property to a short term let (STL) will have an unacceptable impact on neighbouring amenity. The loss of the residential accommodation has not been justified. Whilst it is recognised that there is an economic benefit to the City as a whole from the provision of tourist accommodation, in this case it does not outweigh the adverse impact on residential amenity or the loss of residential accommodation.”
“Planning permission is sought for the change of use of the property from residential (sui generis) to short term let accommodation (sui generis) (in retrospect). No external or internal alterations are proposed.”
Officer report
The site
The property is a three-bedroom first-floor flat in a five-storey tenement, reached through a communal entrance shared with other flats.
“The application property is a first-floor flatted dwelling within a five-storey tenement with shop at ground floor. The property comprises three bedrooms (two with en-suites), a living room, kitchen and bathroom.”
“Access to the property is via a communal door and stairway alongside five other flatted dwellings. The communal door is just off the High Street on Old Assembly Close.”
Officer report
Earlier use and history
The short-term let use began in July 2022; an earlier lawfulness application was withdrawn and an enforcement investigation is ongoing.
“The application form details that the use of the property as a short term let commenced on 11 July 2022.”
“23/06034/CLESTL Flat 2 4 Old Assembly Close 172 High Street Edinburgh EH1 1QX Application for the issue of a certificate of lawfulness confirming its existing use as short-term let visitor accommodation. withdrawn 29 May 2024”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended refusal because the use would harm neighbouring amenity, remove housing without sufficient justification and conflict with development plan policies.
“The change of use of the property to an STL will have an unacceptable impact on neighbouring amenity. The loss of the residential accommodation has not been justified. Whilst it is recognised that there is an economic benefit to the City as a whole from the provision of tourist accommodation, in this case it does not outweigh the adverse impact on residential amenity or the loss of residential accommodation.”
“The proposal does not comply with the Development Plan policies LDP Hou 6 and NPF4 30(e).”
Officer report
Main planning concerns
Visitors’ frequent movement, servicing and limited management were expected to disturb residents and affect their sense of security in the shared stair.
“The STL use would introduce an increased frequency of movement to the property, shared landing, and communal stairway. The property comprises three bedrooms and the STL use would enable visitors to arrive and stay at the property for a short period of time on a regular basis in a manner dissimilar to that of permanent residents.”
“Details surrounding the management of the property as an STL have been provided, however, only limited regard can be given to this. The operator is unable to have complete control over the behaviour of guests as there is no full-time on-site management presence.”
Officer report
Consultation and publicity
No consultations were undertaken; neighbours were notified, site notices and press publicity were used, and 27 contributors responded.
“Date of Neighbour Notification: May 2025 Date of Renotification of Neighbour Notification: Not Applicable Press Publication Date(s): May 2025 Site Notices Date(s): May 2025 Number of Contributors: 27”
Officer report
Public comments
Supporters cited the location, licensing controls and economic benefits, while objectors raised amenity, housing loss, travel and management concerns.
“− Any amenity impact from the use of the property as an STL is mitigated by the property's location. − STL use of the property will be governed by the STL Licensing Scheme, which will protect neighbouring amenity. − STL use of the property will result in economic benefit which outweighs any potential loss of residential accommodation.”
“− Negative impact on residential amenity from STL use within a shared stair. − Loss of residential accommodation. − STL use increases travel, which is a key driver in climate change. − Management of STL use.”
Officer report
The committee decision
The committee refused planning permission for the reasons set out in the officer report, including harm to local amenity and unjustified housing loss.
“25/02224/FULSTL - report by the Chief Planning Officer To REFUSE planning permission for the reasons set out in section C of the report by the Chief Planning Officer.”
Minutes
Sources
- Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee minutes, 6 August 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Edinburgh's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Edinburgh
- Date
- Wednesday 6 August 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended refusal
- Committee decided
- Refused
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Edinburgh committee decisions →
This committee's year
21 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.