Short-term let at 55 Mcdonald Road, Broughton, Edinburgh
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee on 6 Aug 2025.
What was proposed
Permission was sought retrospectively to change a four-bedroom dwelling into a short-term let, without external or internal changes.
“Proposal: Change of use from dwelling to short term let. (in retrospect).”
“Planning permission is sought for a change of use from a residential flatted dwelling (sui generis) to a short term let (sui generis) (in retrospect). No external or internal changes are proposed.”
Officer report
The site
The property is a ground-floor and basement flat in a residential tenement, with front and rear outdoor space and nearby public transport.
“The application property is a ground floor and basement, four-bedroom flat. The property is within a four-storey traditional terraced tenement located to the north eastern side of McDonald Road and is accessed through a private main door entrance from the street. There is a small private outdoor space to the front of the property at street level. At basement level, the property has direct access to rear garden space.”
“The immediate area is predominantly residential in character, with some nearby commercial uses to the south east towards Leith Walk. The street is a busy thoroughfare for accessing nearby uses and connecting nearby areas with Leith Walk.”
Officer report
Earlier applications and enforcement
An earlier short-term-let application was refused, one enforcement enquiry was closed, and another enquiry remained under investigation.
“A Planning Enforcement enquiry in relation to STL use of the property was closed in 2022. There was no substantive evidence of STL use and therefore the case was closed with no further action taken (case reference: 22/00325/ESHORT).”
“A Planning Enforcement enquiry in relation to STL use of the property was received in May 2025. An investigation into this enquiry is ongoing (case reference: 25/00264/ESHORT).”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended refusal because the use would harm neighbouring amenity and the loss of residential accommodation was not justified.
“It is recommended that this application be Refused subject to the details below.”
“The change of use of the property to a short term let (STL) will have an unacceptable impact on neighbouring amenity. The loss of the residential accommodation has not been justified. Whilst it is recognised that there is an economic benefit to the City as a whole from the provision of tourist accommodation, in this case it does not outweigh the adverse impact on residential amenity or the loss of residential accommodation.”
Officer report
Main planning concerns
Visitors, outdoor-space use and servicing could increase disturbance, while claimed economic benefits did not outweigh the loss of a home.
“Additionally, the property has access to outdoor amenity space to the front and rear of the property. This is in the immediate vicinity of gardens for neighbouring residential property. Transient visitors using this space, including at unpredictable hours, are likely to have less regard for neighbouring amenity than individuals using the property as a principal home.”
“To comply with the policy, it is not sufficient to demonstrate that the STL use will deliver economic benefits; rather, it must be demonstrated that the economic benefits associated with any individual application are significant enough that they warrant the loss of a home, and the economic and other benefits associated with this.”
Officer report
What people said
One supporting petition and nine objections were received, with comments about economic benefits, noise, the residential area and lost housing.
“A total of 10 representations were received. This includes 1 petition in support with 21 signatories and 9 objection comments. A summary of the representations is below.”
“− Noise disturbance from STL use, including use of outdoor amenity space. − Size of the property. − Residential area. − STL use would result in loss of residential accommodation.”
Officer report
The committee’s decision
Planning permission was refused for the reasons set out in the application decision.
“25/01606/FULSTL - report by the Chief Planning Officer To REFUSE planning permission for the reasons set out in section C of the report by the Chief Planning Officer. 4.13 - 8A Napier Road, Edinburgh, EH10 5BD”
Minutes
Sources
- Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee minutes, 6 August 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Edinburgh's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Edinburgh
- Date
- Wednesday 6 August 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended refusal
- Committee decided
- Refused
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Edinburgh committee decisions →
This committee's year
21 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.