Short-term let accommodation at Flat 1 27 Blair Street, Old Town, Edinburgh
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee on 19 Nov 2025.
What was proposed
The application sought retrospective permission to change a two-bedroom flat from residential use to short-term let accommodation, without physical changes.
“The application property is a two-bedroom, lower ground floor flat located in a six- storey residential tenement at 27 (Flat 1) Blair Street. The property shares the main door access and ground floor landing with other properties.”
“The application is for a change of use from residential to short term let (sui generis). No internal or external physical changes are proposed. The applicant advises that the short term let use has been in operation since April 2015. Therefore, the application is retrospective.”
Officer report
Earlier applications
An earlier application for the same flat was refused, and an appeal against that refusal was dismissed.
“23/05087/CLESTL Flat 1 27 Blair Street Edinburgh EH1 1QR To continue operating as a Short Term Let. Refused 5 June 2024”
“23/05087/CLESTL Flat 1, 27 Blair Street Edinburgh EH1 1QR. To continue operating as a short term let. Refused 05.06.2024. Subsequently appealed to the Planning and Environmental Appeals Division (DPEA) DPEA dismissed the appeal. 26.11.2024.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended refusal because the proposal would harm neighbouring amenity, fail to justify the loss of a home and conflict with planning policies.
“The proposal complies with Sections 59 and 64 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) (Scotland) Act 1997 as it will not harm the listed building or its setting and it will preserve the character and appearance of the conservation area.”
“The change of use of this property to a short-term let (STL) will have an unacceptable impact on neighbouring amenity. The loss of the residential accommodation has not been justified. Whilst it is recognised that there is an economic benefit to the City as a whole from the provision of tourist accommodation, in this case it does not outweigh the adverse impact on residential amenity or the loss of residential accommodation.”
Officer report
Why amenity mattered
Frequent transient visitors, shared access and additional servicing could disturb residents and affect community cohesion, safety and security.
“However, the application property's location on the lower ground level of a six-storey tenement means guests have to share the ground floor landing and main entrance with other residential properties. The STL use would enable visitors to arrive and stay at the premises for a short period of time on a regular basis in a manner dissimilar to that of permanent residents.”
“The additional servicing that operating a property as an STL requires compared to that of a residential use is also likely to result in an increase in disturbance, further impacting on neighbouring amenity. However, this would be of lesser impact as it is likely that servicing would be conducted during the daytime.”
Officer report
What people said
Twenty-two comments supported the application and one objected, raising points about economic benefits, amenity, licensing and housing stock.
“− Negative impact on residential amenity (including community cohesion and residents' safety and security). − Negative impact on housing stock.”
“− Brings economic benefits. − There will be no negative impact on residential amenity. − The STL use will comply with licensing requirements.”
Officer report
The committee decision
The committee refused planning permission for the reasons set out in the officer report.
“25/01246/FULSTL – Report by the Chief Planning Officer To REFUSE planning permission for the reasons set out in section C of the report by the Chief Planning Officer.”
“Retrospective change of use of premises to short term let accommodation - application no.”
Minutes
Councillors at the meeting
- Hal OslerChairLib Dem
- Joan GriffithsLabour
- David KeySNP
- Martha Mattos CoelhoSNP
- Max MitchellConservative
- Joanna MowatConservative
- Tim PogsonLabour
- Steve BurgessSubstitute for ParkerGreen
- Euan DavidsonSubstitute for LangLib Dem
- Kinross O’NeillSubstitute for Mumford
Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.
Sources
- Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee minutes, 19 November 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Edinburgh's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Edinburgh
- Date
- Wednesday 19 November 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended refusal
- Committee decided
- Refused
- Councillors
- 10Conservative 2Labour 2Lib Dem 2SNP 2Green 11 otherShow councillors
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Edinburgh committee decisions →
This committee's year
150 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.