Short-term let accommodation at 22 Randolph Lane, New Town, Edinburgh

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee on 3 Sept 2025.

25/01097/FULSTLRefused

What was proposed

The application sought retrospective permission to change a residential property into short-term let accommodation, without internal or external alterations.

“Planning permission is sought for the change of use of the property from residential to short term let accommodation (sui generis) (in retrospect). No external or internal alterations are proposed.”

“The application form details that the use of the property as a short term let commenced in August 2016.”

Officer report

The site

The property is a first-floor mews dwelling in a listed building, within the World Heritage Site and New Town Conservation Area.

“The application property is a first-floor mews dwelling forming part of a mews block on Randolph Lane. The property has a private main entrance at street level with internal steps leading up to the living area on the first floor which comprises a bedroom, living room, kitchen, and bathroom.”

“The application property forms part of a category 'C 'listed building (reference: LB46121, date of listing: March 1999) and is in the Old and New Towns of Edinburgh World Heritage Site and the New Town Conservation Area.”

Officer report

Earlier planning history

An earlier application for a certificate confirming existing short-term let use was refused in January 2025.

“23/05998/CLESTL 22 Randolph Lane Edinburgh EH3 7TD Application for the issue of a Certificate of Lawfulness confirming its existing use and a short-term let visitor accommodation. Refused 17 January 2025”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended refusal because the use would harm neighbouring amenity, remove housing without sufficient justification and conflict with development plan policies.

“The change of use of the property to a short term let (STL) will have an unacceptable impact on neighbouring amenity. The loss of the residential accommodation has not been justified. Whilst it is recognised that there is an economic benefit to the City as a whole from the provision of tourist accommodation, in this case it does not outweigh the adverse impact on residential amenity or the loss of residential accommodation.”

“The proposal does not comply with the Development Plan policies LDP Hou 6 and NPF4 30(e). There are no material considerations that outweigh this conclusion. The proposal is unacceptable.”

Officer report

Main planning concerns

Short-term letting was expected to bring more frequent visitors and servicing, creating activity and noise significantly different from nearby residents’ expectations.

“The STL use would introduce an increased frequency of movement to the property and lane. It would enable visitors to arrive and stay at the property for a short period of time on a regular basis in a manner dissimilar to that of permanent residents.”

“The activity and noise generated by the proposed use would be significantly different from what nearby residents might reasonably expect and consequently will have a significant detrimental effect on their living conditions and amenity.”

Officer report

Housing and economic benefits

Officers accepted there would be economic benefits but found they were not demonstrable enough to outweigh losing residential accommodation.

“To comply with the policy, it is not sufficient to demonstrate that the STL use will deliver economic benefits; rather, it must be demonstrated that the economic benefits associated with any individual application are significant enough that they warrant the loss of a home, and the economic and other benefits associated with this.”

“Given the declared housing emergency and pressures on residential accommodation in Edinburgh, in addition to the economic and societal benefits that residential accommodation in the City brings in terms of people being able to live, work and contribute to their community, significant weight has to be given to the retention of existing residential accommodation.”

Officer report

The committee’s decision

The committee refused planning permission for the reasons set out in the officer report.

“25/01097/FULSTL - report by the Chief Planning Officer To REFUSE planning permission for the reasons set out in section C of the report by the Chief Planning Officer.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee minutes, 3 September 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Edinburgh's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Edinburgh
Date
Wednesday 3 September 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended refusal
Committee decided
Refused
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

60 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →