Short-term let conversion at 1A Royston Terrace, Warriston, Edinburgh

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee on 20 Aug 2025.

25/01066/FULSTLRefused

What was proposed

The application sought retrospective permission to change a one-bedroom flat from residential use to short-term let accommodation, without physical changes.

“Proposal: Retrospective change of use from residential flat (sui generis) to STL (sui generis).”

“The application is for the retrospective change of use of the property from a flatted dwelling to short term let (STL). No internal or external physical changes are proposed. The applicant indicates on the application form that the operation of the property as a short stay let commenced on 01/09/2022.”

Officer report

The site

The ground-floor flat lies in a mainly residential street near commercial uses, public transport and the Inverleith Conservation Area.

“The application property is a ground floor flat close to the junction of Royston Terrace and Inverleith Row. It comprises one bedroom, a living room, kitchen, and bathroom. Access is via a private front door.”

“Although Royston Terrace is a predominantly residential street, the property's location to the west end of the street means commercial uses are located either side and across from it. The property is located near to the junction with Inverleith Row which comprises a mix of commercial and residential uses, including a range of shops, cafes, and takeaway units. There is a medium degree of activity in the immediate vicinity of the property.”

Officer report

Earlier applications and enforcement

An earlier short-term-let application was refused, a related appeal was dismissed, and an alleged unauthorised change of use remained pending consideration.

“25/00136/ESHORT 1A Royston Terrace Warriston Edinburgh EH3 5QU Alleged unauthorised change of use of residential dwelling to a short term let.”

“Dismissed - The use of the property for short-term letting accommodation entails a materially different pattern of use from that associated with its occupation on a normal domestic basis and this amounts to a material change of use requiring planning permission. As no planning permission has been granted, the use is not established and is not lawful.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended refusal because the loss of residential accommodation was not justified, although the use met several other planning requirements.

“It is recommended that this application be Refused subject to the details below.”

“The loss of the residential accommodation has not been justified. The proposal does not comply with NPF 4 30(e) part (ii). There are no material considerations that outweigh this conclusion. The proposal is unacceptable.”

Officer report

The main planning issue

The property’s size, private entrance and surrounding activity meant the short-term let would not unacceptably affect nearby residents, but housing loss remained unjustified.

“Access to the property is via a private front door. Further, the property is a compact flat with one bedroom, meaning it can only host a maximum of two people. The mix of uses in the surrounding area means there are higher than usual levels of activity than towards the western end of Royston Terrace.”

“The applicant has submitted a letter from a letting agent stating that they have assessed the property's suitability for long-term letting. It asserts that the space and layout may present challenges in securing stable long-term tenants and there may be high tenant turnover. No evidence has been provided to demonstrate the property is not suitable for long-term letting and therefore limited weight has been given to this letter.”

Officer report

What people said

Twenty-two people supported the application, one objected and one made a neutral comment, with views covering housing, amenity, character and economic benefits.

“− Loss of housing. − Negative environmental impact associated with the loss of housing. − Loss of community. − Negative impact on character of area. − Issues with parking. − Negative impact on amenity.”

“− Positive economic impact. − No detrimental impact on amenity. − The property is unsuitable for long-term housing. − Positive community impact. − The property was never in residential use.”

Officer report

The committee’s decision

The committee refused planning permission for the reasons set out in the officer report.

“25/01066/FULSTL - report by the Chief Planning Officer To REFUSE planning permission for the reasons set out in section C of the report by the Chief Planning Officer. 4.31 - 12 Royston Terrace, Edinburgh, EH3 5QS”

“Retrospective change of use of premises to short term let accommodation – application no.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee minutes, 20 August 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Edinburgh's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Edinburgh
Date
Wednesday 20 August 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended refusal
Committee decided
Refused
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

50 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →