Short-term let accommodation at 1F1 18 Waverley Park, Abbeyhill, Edinburgh

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee on 3 Sept 2025.

25/01002/FULSTLRefused

What was proposed

The application sought retrospective permission to change a one-bedroom flat from residential use to short-term let accommodation, without physical changes.

“The change of use of this property to a short term let (STL) will have an unacceptable impact on neighbouring amenity. The loss of the residential accommodation has not been justified. Whilst it is recognised that there is an economic benefit to the City as a whole from the provision of tourist accommodation, in this case it does not outweigh the adverse impact on residential amenity or the loss of residential accommodation.”

“The application is for the change of use of the property from a flatted dwelling to short term let (sui generis). No internal or external physical changes are proposed. The application form states that the operation of the property as a short term let commenced on 12 April 2019. The application is therefore retrospective.”

Officer report

The site

The property is a first-floor flat in a four-storey residential tenement, sharing an entrance and stairwell with other homes.

“The application property is a one-bedroom flat on the first floor of a four-storey tenement block at 18 (1F1) Waverley Park, Abbeyhill. The property shares a communal entrance door and stairwell with other flats.”

“Waverley Park is a cul-de-sac with no through route for vehicles and is entirely residential.”

Officer report

Earlier applications

An earlier certificate application was refused and a later certificate application was withdrawn; there was no other relevant site history.

“23/05163/CLESTL 1F1 18 Waverley Park Edinburgh EH8 8ET Short term let (change of use to short term let took place within the last 10 years but is not a material change of use). Refused 5 June 2024”

“There is no pre-application process history.”

Officer report

Main planning concerns

Guests’ movement, servicing and transient occupation were expected to create disturbance, while the claimed economic benefits were based on assumptions and estimates.

“To comply with the policy, it is not sufficient to demonstrate that the STL use will deliver economic benefits; rather, it must be demonstrated that the economic benefits associated with any individual application are significant enough that they warrant the loss of a home, and the economic and other benefits associated with this.”

“It is acknowledged that there is an economic benefit of providing visitor accommodation. However, the supporting information is based on assumptions and estimates of income and does not consider the other benefits of residential.”

Officer report

Consultation and publicity

No consultations were undertaken, and neighbour notification took place on 4 March 2025.

“Date of Neighbour Notification: March 2025 Date of Renotification of Neighbour Notification: Not Applicable Press Publication Date(s): Not Applicable Site Notices Date(s): Not Applicable…”

Officer report

What people said

There were 23 supporting comments and two objections, with views covering economic benefits, licensing, residential amenity and retaining the home.

“A total of 25 representations have been received. These are 23 individual comments, all in support, including one petition in support with 21 signatories, and two objections. One of the petition signatories is in duplicate. It is noted that 21 of the petition signatories have also submitted comments in support.”

“− Brings economic benefits. − There will be no negative impact on residential amenity. − The STL use will comply with licensing requirements.”

Officer report

The committee’s decision

The committee refused planning permission for the reasons set out in section C, concerning harm to local amenity and unjustified loss of residential accommodation.

“25/01002/FULSTL - report by the Chief Planning Office To REFUSE planning permission for the reasons set out in section C of the report by the Chief Planning Officer.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee minutes, 3 September 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Edinburgh's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Edinburgh
Date
Wednesday 3 September 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended refusal
Committee decided
Refused
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

60 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →