Short-term let accommodation at Flat 4 14 High Riggs, Edinburgh

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee on 22 Oct 2025.

25/00965/FULSTLRefused

What was proposed

The application sought retrospective permission to change a first-floor flat from residential use to short-term let accommodation, without physical changes.

“The application is for the retrospective change of use of the property from a flatted dwelling to short term let (STL). No internal or external physical changes are proposed. The applicant indicates on the application form that the operation of the property as a short term let commenced on 01 December 2021.”

“The applicant has provided a supporting statement and economic report to support the application.”

Officer report

The site

The property is a one-bedroom flat in a four-storey tenement, sharing an entrance and stairwell with other homes in the West End Conservation Area.

“The application property is a first floor flat within a four-storey tenement towards the north east end of High Riggs. It comprises a bedroom, kitchen, lounge and bathroom. Access is via a communal entrance and stairwell shared with other residential properties.”

“The property is in the West End Conservation Area.”

Officer report

Earlier applications

An earlier retrospective short-term let application and a lawfulness certificate application were both withdrawn.

“22/05013/FULSTL Flat 4 14 High Riggs Edinburgh EH3 9BX Change of use (retrospective) from residential flat to a short-term let. To provide short- term holiday lets for visitors to Edinburgh whilst also retaining the property to use for their own work / leisure uses (Sui Generis). withdrawn 28 December 2022”

“23/04590/CLESTL Flat 4 14 High Riggs Edinburgh EH3 9BX Application for the issue of a Certificate of Lawfulness confirming its existing use and a short-term let visitor accommodation. withdrawn 15 May 2024”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended refusal because the use would harm neighbouring amenity and the loss of residential accommodation was not outweighed by economic benefits.

“It is recommended that this application be Refused subject to the details below.”

“The change of use of this property to a short term let (STL) will have an unacceptable impact on neighbouring amenity. The loss of the residential accommodation has not been justified. Whilst it is recognised that there is an economic benefit to the City as a whole from the provision of tourist accommodation, in this case it does not outweigh the adverse impact on residential amenity or the loss of residential accommodation.”

Officer report

Impact on neighbours

Visitors passing residents’ doors, frequent arrivals and departures, servicing and limited management were judged likely to cause significant disturbance.

“Although it is noted that the property is a compact flat with one bedroom, its location on the first floor of the tenement means guests are required to pass doors of other residents as they move to and from the property. The STL use would also enable visitors to arrive and stay at the premises for a short period of time on a regular basis throughout the year in a manner dissimilar to that of permanent residents.”

“The additional servicing that operating a property as an STL requires compared to that of a residential use is also likely to result in an increase in disturbance, further impacting on neighbouring amenity. However, this would be of lesser impact as it is likely that servicing would be conducted during the daytime.”

Officer report

Loss of a home

The economic benefits of tourist accommodation were not considered demonstrable enough to outweigh the loss of residential accommodation.

“NPF 4 policy 30 (e) part (ii) requires that where there is a loss of residential accommodation, this will only be supported where the loss is outweighed by demonstrable local economic benefits. Comments in support state that the residential use was never taken up at the property before it became an STL. However, there is no evidence to confirm this claim.”

“To comply with the policy, it is not sufficient to demonstrate that the STL use will deliver economic benefits; rather, it must be demonstrated that the economic benefits associated with any individual application are significant enough that they warrant the loss of a home, and the economic and other benefits associated with this.”

Officer report

The decision

Planning permission was refused for the reasons set out in the officer report.

“25/00965/FULSTL – Report by the Chief Planning Officer To REFUSE planning permission for the reasons set out in section C of the report by the Chief Planning Officer.”

Minutes

Reasons for refusal

The reasons were harm to nearby residents’ living conditions and amenity, together with unjustified loss of a residential property.

“The proposal is contrary to Local Development Plan Policy Hou 6 in respect of Inappropriate Uses in Residential Areas, as the use of this property as a short term let will have a materially detrimental effect on the living conditions and amenity of nearby residents.”

“The proposal is contrary to National Planning Framework 4 Policy 30(e) in respect of Local Amenity and Loss of Residential Accommodation, as the use of this dwelling as a short term let will result in an unacceptable impact on local amenity and the loss of a residential property has not been justified.”

Officer report

Councillors at the meeting

Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.

Sources

  • Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee minutes, 22 October 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Edinburgh's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Edinburgh
Date
Wednesday 22 October 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended refusal
Committee decided
Refused
Councillors
10Conservative 2Green 2Labour 2Lib Dem 2SNP 11 otherShow councillors
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

98 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →