Short-term let accommodation at 1F3 60 St Mary's Street, Edinburgh

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee on 20 Aug 2025.

25/00717/FULSTLRefused

What was proposed

The application sought retrospective permission to change a one-bedroom flat from residential use to short-term let accommodation, without physical alterations.

“The application is for the retrospective change of use of the property from a flatted dwelling to short term let (STL). No internal or external physical changes are proposed. The applicant indicates on the application form that the operation of the property as a short stay let commenced on 01 April 2016.”

“The applicant has provided a planning statement and economic report to support the application.”

Officer report

The site

The flat is in a listed tenement within the Old Town Conservation Area, surrounded by commercial uses and tourist accommodation.

“The immediate and surrounding area is characterised by a wide mix of commercial uses including shops, bars, restaurants, and tourist accommodation. A hotel is located directly opposite the application property. There is a high level of on-street activity and ambient noise in the immediate vicinity of the property during the day and into the evening.”

“The property forms part of a category B listed building, is in the Old Town Conservation Area and the Old and New Towns of Edinburgh World Heritage Site.”

Officer report

Earlier planning history

An earlier application to confirm the existing short-term let use was withdrawn, and no other relevant planning history was identified.

“23/04348/CLESTL 1F3 60 St Mary's Street Edinburgh EH1 1SX To confirm existing use as Short-Term Let withdrawn 15 May 2024”

“There is no pre-application process history.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended refusal because the proposal would harm neighbouring amenity, lose residential accommodation and fail relevant development plan policies.

“The change of use of this property to a short term let (STL) will have an unacceptable impact on neighbouring amenity. The loss of the residential accommodation has not been justified. Whilst it is recognised that there is an economic benefit to the city as a whole from the provision of tourist accommodation in this case it does not outweigh the adverse impact on residential amenity or loss of residential accommodation.”

“The proposal does not comply with the Development Plan policy NPF 4 policy 30(e) and LDP policy Hou 6. There are no material considerations that outweigh this conclusion. The proposal is unacceptable.”

Officer report

The main planning concerns

Guests’ movement, servicing and lack of full-time management were expected to disturb neighbours, while the economic benefits did not justify losing a home.

“Details surrounding the management of the property as an STL have been provided, however, only limited regard can be given to this. The operator is unable to have complete control over the behaviour of guests as there is no full-time on-site management presence.”

“To comply with the policy, it is not sufficient to demonstrate that the STL use will deliver economic benefits; rather, it must be demonstrated that the economic benefits associated with any individual application are significant enough that they warrant the loss of a home, and the economic and other benefits associated with this.”

Officer report

Consultation and publicity

No consultations were undertaken; neighbour notification, press publicity and site notices generated 25 contributors.

“Date of Neighbour Notification: February 2025 Date of Renotification of Neighbour Notification: Not Applicable Press Publication Date(s): February 2025 Site Notices Date(s): February 2025 Number of Contributors: 25”

Officer report

What people said

Twenty-two representations and a petition supported the application, citing economic benefits, licensing, residential suitability and no harm to amenity.

“A total of 23 comments were received, 22 were representations in support and a petition in support with 21 signatures was also received. Whilst it has 21 names and addresses, there is a duplicate signature. It is noted that 19 of the petition signatories have also submitted comments in support. A summary of the representations is provided below:”

“− Positive economic impact. − No negative impact on residential amenity. − Economic benefit of STL outweighs the loss of residential accommodation. − Not suitable for residential accommodation. − The STL use will comply with licensing requirements.”

Officer report

The decision

Planning permission was refused for an unacceptable impact on local amenity and an unjustified loss of residential accommodation.

“25/00717/FULSTL - report by the Chief Planning Officer To REFUSE planning permission for the reasons set out in section C of the report by the Chief Planning Officer. 4.23 - Flat 2 43 New Street, Edinburgh, EH8 8BH”

“Retrospective change of use of premises to short-term let accommodation - application no.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee minutes, 20 August 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Edinburgh's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Edinburgh
Date
Wednesday 20 August 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended refusal
Committee decided
Refused
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

50 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →