Short-term let accommodation at 1F2 116 Rose Street, Edinburgh
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee on 20 Aug 2025.
What was proposed
The application sought retrospective permission to change a flat from residential use to short-term let accommodation, without physical changes.
“The application property is a first floor flat within a three-storey and attic tenement on the south side of Rose Street. There a commercial units at ground floor level and residential and lawful short term let uses in the upper floors. Access is via a communal entrance and stairwell shared with residential and short term let properties.”
“The application is for the retrospective change of use of the property from a flatted dwelling to short term let (STL). No internal or external physical changes are proposed. The applicant indicates on the application form that the operation of the property as a short stay let commenced on 01/07/2019.”
Officer report
The site
The property is a first-floor flat in a listed tenement within the New Town Conservation Area, with residential and lawful short-term let uses nearby.
“The property is a category B listed building (reference LB29648, dated 28/03/1996) and is in the New Town Conservation Area and the Old and New Towns of Edinburgh World Heritage Site.”
Officer report
Earlier applications
There was no relevant site history, but an earlier application for short-term accommodation in another flat was granted in January 2023.
“Relevant Site History No relevant site history.”
“22/04478/CLE 1F1 116 Rose Street Edinburgh EH2 3JF Short term self-catering accommodation that has been continually operational for over 10 years.”
Officer report
Officers’ recommendation
Officers recommended refusal because the loss of residential accommodation was unjustified, despite acceptable heritage and nearby-amenity effects.
“It is recommended that this application be Refused subject to the details below.”
“Whilst the change of use to an STL will not have a materially detrimental effect on the living conditions of nearby residents or an unacceptable impact on the character of the area in compliance with development plan policies LDP Hou 6 and NPF4 30(e)(i), the loss of the residential accommodation has not been justified. The proposal does not comply with NPF 4 30(e) part (ii). There are no material considerations that outweigh this conclusion. The proposal is unacceptable.”
Officer report
Why officers objected
The economic evidence did not demonstrate benefits sufficient to outweigh the loss of a home amid Edinburgh’s housing pressures.
“To comply with the policy, it is not sufficient to demonstrate that the STL use will deliver economic benefits; rather, it must be demonstrated that the economic benefits associated with any individual application are significant enough that they warrant the loss of a home, and the economic and other benefits associated with this.”
“Given the declared housing emergency and pressures on residential accommodation in Edinburgh, in addition to the economic and societal benefits that residential accommodation in the City brings in terms of people being able to live, work and contribute to their community, significant weight has to be given to the retention of existing residential accommodation.”
Officer report
What people said
Twenty-two representations and a petition supported the application, citing licensing compliance, economic benefits and no detrimental impact on amenity.
“A total of 23 representations have been received with 22 in support and a petition in support with 21 signatories. Whilst the petition has 21 names and addresses, there is a duplicate signature. It is noted that 19 of the petition signatories have also submitted comments in support. A summary of the representations is provided below:”
“− The STL use will comply with licensing requirements. − Positive economic impact. − No detrimental impact on amenity.”
Officer report
The committee’s decision
The committee refused planning permission for the reasons set out in the officer report.
“25/00463/FULSTL - report by the Chief Planning Officer To REFUSE planning permission for the reasons set out in section C of the report by the Chief Planning Officer. 4.30 - 1A Royston Terrace, Warriston, Edinburgh…”
Minutes
Sources
- Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee minutes, 20 August 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Edinburgh's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Edinburgh
- Date
- Wednesday 20 August 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended refusal
- Committee decided
- Refused
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Edinburgh committee decisions →
This committee's year
50 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.