Short-term let conversion at 405 Webster's Land, Edinburgh
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee on 6 Aug 2025.
What was proposed
The application sought retrospective permission to change a flat from residential use to short-term let accommodation, without physical alterations.
“The application is for the retrospective change of use of the property from a flatted dwelling to short term let (STL). No internal or external physical changes are proposed. The applicant indicates on the application form that the operation of the property as a short stay let commenced on 16/06/2017.”
“The applicant has provided a planning statement and economic report to support the application.”
Officer report
The site
The first-floor flat is in a residential development near the Grassmarket and West Port, within the Old Town Conservation Area and World Heritage Site.
“The application property is a first floor flat at 405 Webster's Land a large residential development arranged around a courtyard. It comprises a bedroom, kitchen/living room and bathroom. Access to the property is via a communal stair/walkway and a secure gated access.”
“The property is in the Old Town Conservation Area and the Old and New Towns of Edinburgh World Heritage Site.”
Officer report
Earlier applications
An earlier change-of-use application was refused, and a later certificate of lawfulness application was withdrawn.
“22/02967/FUL 405 Webster's Land Edinburgh EH1 2RX Change of use from residential to short-term let (STL). Refused 13 October 2022”
“23/05982/CLESTL 405 Webster's Land Tollcross Edinburgh EH1 2RX Application for the issue of a Certificate of Lawfulness confirming its existing use and a short-term let visitor accommodation. withdrawn 15 May 2024”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended refusal because the use would harm neighbouring amenity and the loss of residential accommodation was not justified.
“It is recommended that this application be Refused subject to the details below.”
“The change of use of this property to a short term let (STL) will have an unacceptable impact on neighbouring amenity. The loss of the residential accommodation has not been justified. Whilst it is recognised that there is an economic benefit to the City as a whole from the provision of tourist accommodation, in this case it does not outweigh the adverse impact on residential amenity or the loss of residential accommodation.”
Officer report
Main planning concerns
Visitors using the shared access and additional servicing could increase disturbance, while the economic benefits did not outweigh losing a home.
“However, the one-bedroom property is accessed via an entrance door that is connected to the communal entrance gate by a walkway and stair, this is shared by other residential properties. Therefore, the use of this property as an STL would introduce an increased frequency of movement to and from the property through the shared entrance and corridor.”
“To comply with the policy, it is not sufficient to demonstrate that the STL use will deliver economic benefits; rather, it must be demonstrated that the economic benefits associated with any individual application are significant enough that they warrant the loss of a home, and the economic and other benefits associated with this.”
Officer report
Public views
Twenty-two representations supported the proposal, two objected, and a supporting petition had 23 signatures.
“A total of 25 representations have been received, 22 in support, two objections and a petition in support with 23 signatures was also received. It is noted that two of the petition signatories have also submitted comments in support. A summary of the representations is provided below.”
Officer report
What members considered
The application was considered by the Development Management Sub-Committee because of the number of representations received.
“The application has been referred to the Development Management Sub-Committee under the Council's Scheme of Delegation. The application must be determined by the Development Management Sub Committee due to the number of representations received.”
Officer report
The committee’s decision
The committee refused planning permission for the reasons set out in the officer report.
“25/00441/FULSTL - report by the Chief Planning Officer To REFUSE planning permission for the reasons set out in section C of the report by the Chief Planning Officer. 4.20 - Flat 5, 30 West Crosscauseway, Newington Retrospective change of use of premises to short term let accommodation - application no.”
Minutes
Sources
- Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee minutes, 6 August 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Edinburgh's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Edinburgh
- Date
- Wednesday 6 August 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended refusal
- Committee decided
- Refused
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Edinburgh committee decisions →
This committee's year
21 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.