Short-term let accommodation at Flat 19 24 Simpson Loan, Edinburgh

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee on 5 Nov 2025.

25/00259/FULSTLRefused

What was proposed

The application sought retrospective permission to change a two-bedroom flat from residential use to short-term let accommodation, without physical alterations.

“The change of use of this property to a short term let (STL) will have an unacceptable impact on neighbouring amenity. The loss of the residential accommodation has not been justified. Whilst it is recognised that there is an economic benefit to the City as a whole from the provision of tourist accommodation, in this case it does not outweigh the adverse impact on residential amenity or the loss of residential accommodation.”

“The application is for the retrospective change of use of the property from a flatted dwelling to short term let (STL). No internal or external physical changes are proposed. The applicant indicates on the application form that the operation of the property as a short term let commenced on 13 April 2019.”

Officer report

The site

The flat is on the fourth floor of a contemporary residential block beside the Meadows, sharing a communal entrance and stairwell with other homes.

“The application property is a two-bedroom flat located on the fourth floor of a contemporary residential block which is directly adjacent to the Meadows public park. Access to the property is via a communal door and stairwell shared with other residential properties.”

“Although there a mix of uses in the Quartermile area which include bakeries, cafes, restaurants and a hotel, Simpson Loan itself is predominantly residential and has low levels of pedestrian and vehicle activity.”

Officer report

Earlier application

An earlier application for a certificate confirming existing short-term let use was withdrawn on 15 May 2024.

“23/06017/CLESTL Flat 19 24 Simpson Loan Edinburgh EH3 9GE Application for the issue of a Certificate of Lawfulness confirming its existing use and a short-term let visitor accommodation. withdrawn 15 May 2024”

“There is no pre-application process history.”

Officer report

Main planning concerns

Visitors’ movement, noise and servicing in the shared building were expected to significantly affect residents, while the loss of a home was not justified.

“It is acknowledged there are a mix of uses within the area which include a cafe, restaurant and hotel and given the close proximity to the Futures Institute and the Meadows there is a moderate pattern of activity within the area. However, the use of this property as an STL would introduce an increased frequency of movement to and from the property, shared stairwell and communal door.”

“The activity and noise generated by the proposed use would be significantly different from what neighbouring residents living within the building might reasonably expect and consequently will have a significant detrimental effect on their living conditions and amenity.”

Officer report

Public involvement

No consultations were undertaken, while neighbour notification, press publication and site notices attracted 52 contributors.

“Date of Neighbour Notification: 7 February 2025 Date of Renotification of Neighbour Notification: Not Applicable Press Publication Date(s): 14 February 2025 Site Notices Date(s): 11 February 2025 Number of Contributors: 52”

Officer report

What people said

Supporters cited economic benefits, licensing and no amenity harm; objectors raised residential amenity, housing stock, safety and policy concerns.

“− Economic benefit to the area and city resulting from the proposal. − The STL use will comply with licensing requirements. − Positive economic impact. − No detrimental impact on amenity.”

“− Negative impact on residential amenity (including community cohesion, security and safety). − Negative impact on housing stock. − Conflicts with LDP Policy Hou 6. − Conflicts with NPF 4 Policy 30 (e).”

Officer report

The committee’s decision

The committee refused planning permission for the reasons set out in the officer report.

“25/00259/FULSTL – Report by the Chief Planning Officer To REFUSE planning permission for the reasons set out in section C of the report by the Chief Planning Officer…”

Minutes

Councillors at the meeting

Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.

Sources

  • Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee minutes, 5 November 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Edinburgh's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Edinburgh
Date
Wednesday 5 November 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended refusal
Committee decided
Refused
Councillors
10Conservative 2Green 2Lib Dem 2SNP 2Labour 1Lab Co-op 1Show councillors
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

126 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →