Detached dwelling with garage at Land Rear Of 10 To 22 Malvern Meadow, Temple Ewell

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Dover Planning Committee on 16 Jul 2026.

24/00156Approved

What was proposed

The application proposed a contemporary two-storey detached dwelling, garage, natural pool and plant room with associated access and landscaping.

“24/00156 – Erection of a detached dwelling, garage, natural pool and plant room with associated access and landscaping – Land Rear of 10 to 22 Malvern Meadow, Temple Ewell, Dover…”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The vacant amenity land lies beside Temple Ewell, is used for dog walking and recreation, slopes steeply, and is a Local Wildlife Site.

“The application site is land to the northeast of 10 to 22 Malvern Meadow and lies immediately adjacent to the settlement confines of Temple Ewell. The application site is currently vacant/ amenity land and used for dog walking and recreation. The application site is also a Local Wildlife Site. The land slopes steeply to the north with an area of trees to the northwest protected under TPO/24/00020.”

“To the east of the site is Malvern Lodge, which is a detached dwelling of contemporary design. To the southwest of the site are Nos 10 to 22 Malvern Meadow, which are varied in material finish and design.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval because the principle, design, residential amenity, highways, drainage, trees and ecology were considered acceptable subject to controls.

“The principle of the development accords with Policies SP4 and is therefore an acceptable use for the application site.”

“The erection of a dwelling in this location, due to the siting, scale and design would preserve the character and appearance of the street scene and surrounding area. In addition, the proposals would result in no harm to the residential amenities of the surrounding dwellings and provide a good level of amenity for future occupiers.”

Officer report

What consultees said

Consultees raised access, fire tender, wildlife, tree and ecological issues, but later accepted mitigation or raised no objection subject to conditions.

“In addition to our earlier comments in particular surrounding the issues of access to the proposed dwelling, it has been brought to our attention that the land where the applicant intends creating a vehicular access point appears not to be wholly owned by the applicant (we have seen evidence of this purporting to be from HM Land Registry).”

“Second consultation: The proposed mitigation and enhancement measures put forward to address impacts to species, particularly reptiles, are considered to be acceptable subject to condition. On balance, the proposed measures put forward to mitigate and compensate for the area of LWS lost to enable the development are sufficient to remove our objection to the proposal.”

Officer report

What members discussed

Members considered the amended 3.7-metre access, policy compliance, the contemporary design, wildlife mitigation and possible glare from reflective materials.

“Members viewed an aerial view, plan and photographs of the application site which comprised land that lay immediately adjacent to the settlement confines of Temple Ewell. The application site was currently used for dog walking and recreational purposes and was also a Local Wildlife site. The Senior Planner advised that planning permission was sought for the erection of a detached dwelling and garage with associated access and landscaping.”

“In response to the Chairman, the Senior Planner explained that all the relevant criteria of Policy SP4 had to be met for a proposal to be acceptable. Whilst criterion G was relevant and had been met, criteria H, I, J and K were not relevant. Councillor Back commented that the proposal accorded with Policy SP4 and that Temple Ewell Parish Council appeared to be neutral about the application.”

Minutes

The committee’s decision

The committee approved the application subject to a highways contribution, twenty planning conditions and delegated authority for final conditions and obligations.

“(b) That powers be delegated to the Head of Planning and Development to settle any necessary planning conditions and obligations in line with the issues set out in the report and as resolved by the Planning Committee.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Dover Planning Committee minutes, 16 July 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Dover's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Dover
Date
Thursday 16 July 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

58 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →