40 town-centre apartments at 2 - 8 High Street, Chesterfield

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Chesterfield Planning Committee on 6 Jul 2026.

CHE/25/00340/FULApproved

The site and its history

The vacant former store fronts two town-centre streets, lies in a conservation area, and has three recent conditional permissions for alterations.

“The application relates to the vacant former Marks and Spencer store which fronts both Knifesmithgate and the Market Square on High Street. The whole building has substantially different architectural approaches to either elevation of the building. This large town centre premises has been vacant for a considerable period of time.”

“The site is within the Town Centre Conservation Area with a number of listed buildings in close proximity to the site within the market square. The existing retail uses fronting the Market Square on the lower ground floor of the building have recently been reduced in size and are now partially occupied.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval because the housing would reuse a vacant building in a walkable centre, retain an active frontage and add needed homes.

“However, the development as currently shown would not maintain an active frontage onto Knifesmithgate. In considering this negative of the scheme it should be noted that at present the Council cannot demonstrate a supply of deliverable housing sites when measured against the new housing targets. The Local Plan policies ‘most relevant’ to this application are CLP1, CLP2, CLP8 and SS1 and these are considered to remain relevant and up to date policies for consideration.”

“In this location affordable housing requirements would be expected at 10%. However, the site relates to the conversion of an existing vacant building, in such cases national policy provides an incentive for brownfield development on sites containing vacant buildings.”

Officer report

Design and living conditions

The alterations were considered acceptable in the conservation area, while internal light, noise, amenity space and security concerns could be managed or accepted.

“The alterations to the Market Square facing parts of the building are considered to be minimal and acceptable alterations to the building. To the Knifesmithgate elevation the works will alter the brutalist style of the architecture diluting its original quality. However, this has to be balanced against the re-use and repair of the building which will result in some enhancement and that the enlarged openings enable more light to the interior.”

“Ideally substantial areas of external amenity space should be provided for the use of future residents. In this case an internal courtyard is proposed which is part communal and includes small private terraces measuring in the region of 340sqm. This does not meet the required extent for amenity space of 25 sqm per apartment for 40 units.”

Officer report

What people said

One commenter raised concerns about compact apartments, daylight, noise, drainage, courtyard use and fire evacuation; the hospital sought a contribution, while CPRE supported the scheme.

“I wish to express my concerns about the 43 apartments proposed for the upper floors. I have no objection in principal but many of the apartments would appear to be very compact, There are some apartments adjacent to the main lift shafts for the retail units which may produce noise/ vibrations. I am concerned about the inner open courtyard which will provide the only daylight to the inner apartments.”

“From CPRE Derbyshire. CPRE Derbyshire, the Countryside Charity, promote a ‘Brownfield First’ approach to developments. Urban regeneration is essential in order to secure a vibrant future for our towns and cities and to protect the countryside from unnecessary development. Town centres provide a special opportunity to re-use existing buildings for homes and to make use of existing infrastructure.”

Officer report

Committee discussion

Members noted that space standards were met, the scheme would bring an empty building back into use, and the location had public transport links.

“The Principal Planner presented the report explaining the application relates to the vacant former Marks and Spencer store which fronts both Knifesmithgate and the Market Square on High Street. Planning permission is sought to convert the upper floors of the building (from ground floor viewed from Knifesmithgate) into 40 apartments.”

“The Committee considered the report noting the space standards had been met and the communal areas on balance would be providing housing in the Town Centre and bringing an empty building back into use. The application site would be within a sustainable location and would have bus links and a train station. It was moved by Councillor Stone and seconded by Councillor Yates that the officer recommendation be upheld.”

Minutes

The decision

The committee upheld the officer recommendation and granted permission subject to the conditions set out for the development.

“That the officer recommendation be upheld, and the application be GRANTED, subject to the conditions outlined in the officer’s report.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Chesterfield Planning Committee minutes, 6 July 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Chesterfield's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Monday 6 July 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

49 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →