Men’s Shed community facility at Lands 300m SE of 41 Dogleap Road, Limavady
Summary of planning committee decision
Deferred by Causeway And Glens Planning Committee on 26 Aug 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought to retain, refurbish, extend and change the use of mill buildings for a Men’s Shed and provide ground-mounted solar panels.
“No: LA01/2023/1276/F Ward: Dundooan App Type: Full Address: Lands 300m SE of 41 Dogleap Road, Limavady…”
“Proposal: Proposed Retention, Refurbishment, change of use and extension of existing unlisted Mill Buildings to provide a new Mens Shed Community Facility and ground mounted solar panel array for on- site energy generation, and all associated works Con Area: N/A Valid Date: 30.01.2024 Listed Building Grade: N/A Agent: Bell Architects, 65 Main Street, Ballymoney, BT53 6AN”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The site is in agricultural land beside Roe Valley Country Park, within a designated landscape area and next to the River Roe.
“The application site is located on lands 300m SE of 41 Dogleap Road, Limavady. The application site is located on agricultural lands, which are immediately adjacent to the Roe Valley Country Park with vehicular access to the site proposed via the existing internal tracks and pedestrian pathways within the Roe Valley Country Park.”
“The application site is located within the rural area as defined in the Northern Area Plan 2016, sited approximately 1.3km south of Limavady Town and 0.4km west of the hamlet of Ardgarvan. The application site is located within the designated Roe Valley Country Park Local Landscape Policy Area (LLPA) and is immediately adjacent to the River Roe, which is a designated SAC/ASSI site and the Roe Valley Country Park which is a significant visitor attraction.”
Officer report
Related application
A separate current application seeks to refurbish a derelict cottage as caretaker accommodation supporting the proposed Men’s Shed facility.
“LA01/2024/0137/F - Lands 300m SE of 41 Dogleap Road Limavady - Refurbishment of existing cottage to provide a caretakers cottage as adjacent accommodation support to the proposed Mens Shed community facility, and all associated works – Current Application…”
Officer report
Why refusal was advised
The proposal was considered unacceptable because of its countryside location, access arrangements, flood risk, protected sites, parking and tourism impacts.
“Many of the issues raised within the letters of objection have been addressed within the report above. While acknowledging the benefits and value of the Men’s Shed organisation the proposed use is one which is considered to be a town centre type use and therefore is not appropriate for the location.”
“In conclusion refusal is recommended. The proposal is located within the Roe Valley Country Park LLPA which outlines a presumption against development other than that essential to the operation of agriculture and for the operation of the country park, neither of which relate to the proposed development. The proposal seeks to utilise the existing pedestrian pathway within the Roe Valley Country Park to facilitate vehicular access to the site.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
Roads, heritage, environmental health and several environmental bodies raised no objections, while other consultees requested information or objected.
“Letters of objection have been received. The issues raised within the objection letters include…”
“Internal DFI Roads: No objections. Rivers Agency: FRA Requested. Not submitted. NI Water: Refusal. NIEA NED: Further information required. Not submitted. HED: No objections. Environmental Health: No objections. NIEA WMU: No objections. NIEA Regulation Unit: No objections. Loughs Agency: CEMP Requested. Not submitted. Shared Environmental Services: Further information required. Council’s Local Development Plan Team: Objection.”
Officer report
What people said
Supporters cited heritage, men’s wellbeing, community benefits and sustainability, while objectors raised concerns about landscape, traffic, wildlife, access and future expansion.
“The new location will provide the local community with easier access to the Men’s Shed, as well as offering members the therapeutic benefits offered by the Roe Valley Country Park area. • Men’s shed is a valuable community service. • NHS services are dependent on the charity and voluntary sectors to provide assistance for lower level problems or as a stop gap while awaiting higher level services • Limavady has suffered from a lack of resources, especially for men.”
“Development would have a detrimental impact on an area of outstanding natural beauty/open space used by locals and visitors • Road is unsuitable for constant traffic and upgrading it would detract from the ambience of the area • Proposed development would not enhance the area of the Country Park • Development would negatively impact the environment including bird and other animal habitats • The location will not suit many who use the facility which may prevent them from…”
Officer report
Committee debate
A member proposed deferring both related applications for a site visit so committee members could see the site.
“Proposed by Councillor McMullan Seconded by Councillor C Archibald - That the Committee defer consideration of Item LA01/2023/1276/F and Item LA01/2024/0137/F for a site visit as it would be beneficial for Committee Members to see the site.”
Minutes
The vote
Twelve members supported the deferral, with none against and none abstaining.
“The Chair put the motion to the Committee to vote. Members voted For; Members voted Against, 0 Member Abstained The Chair declared the motion carried.”
Minutes
Sources
- Causeway And Glens Planning Committee minutes, 26 August 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Causeway And Glens's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Causeway And Glens
- Date
- Wednesday 26 August 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended refusal
- Committee decided
- Deferred
- Vote
- 12 for, 0 against
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Causeway And Glens committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
65 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 5 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.