Boundary wall and entrance changes at Ruperra Castle Estate Rudry Road To Craig Llan, Rudry
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Caerphilly Planning Committee on 8 Apr 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed widening the south drive entrance and creating pedestrian openings in the northern and southern boundary wall.
“Description and Location of Development: Widen south drive entrance and the formation of new openings in northern and southern parts of the boundary wall - Ruperra Castle Estate Rudry Road To Craig Llan Rudry…”
“Development: Widen south drive entrance and the formation of new openings in northern and southern parts of the boundary wall.”
Officer report
The site and its setting
The site is in open countryside within the grounds of a scheduled monument, listed buildings, a conservation area, historic park and garden, and SSSI.
“The site is located in the open countryside approximately seven miles to the north east of Cardiff and also approximately seven miles to the west of Newport. The nearest settlement to it is Draethen village which is located to the north, at a distance of just over half of mile. The site is bounded in all directions by undeveloped land. To the north is woodland, with the land to the east, west and south being open fields.”
“Site description: The proposals lie within the grounds of Ruperra Castle, which is a scheduled ancient monument, a grade II* listed building and within a site where there are other (Grade II) listed buildings and curtilage buildings, this site being delineated by a random rubble stone boundary wall.”
Officer report
Earlier applications
Earlier permissions covered conservation repairs, residential and stable use, and related condition discharges; a linked listed-building application remains pending.
“23/0815/COND - Discharge condition 03 (Listed Building - re-use of materials from) and 04 (Listed Building - roof tiles) of planning consent 19/0788/LBC (Carry out conservation repairs to the Former Dairy and Laundry (The Bothy) and change the use of the Stables and Coach House building to a mixed use of 7 No. new residential units and stables) - Decided 24.01.2024.”
“23/0796/COND - Discharge Conditions 03 (Listed Building - re-use of materials from), 04 (Listed Building - roof tiles), 05 (stables), 06 (Landscape and Ecological Management Plan), 07 (Drainage), 09 (Building record), 10 (archeological interest), 11 (Revised Landscaping), 12 (Maintenance - management plan) and 13 (Boundary treatments) of planning consent 19/0787/COU (Carry out conservation repairs to the Former Dairy and Laundry (The Bothy) and change the use of the Stables…”
Officer report
Why officers supported it
Officers considered the limited, traditional works would preserve heritage assets, support future castle conservation, and have acceptable visual, tree and highway impacts.
“The principal justification for the proposed works lies in the need to facilitate the ongoing and future conservation, stabilisation and repair of Ruperra Castle and its associated listed buildings. The widening of the South Drive entrance would enable access for construction vehicles, cranes and specialist equipment required to deliver grant-funded investigations and essential conservation works.”
“The creation of new pedestrian openings in the boundary wall is proposed in association with a potential future diversion of a Public Right of Way. As the diversion has not been confirmed it therefore attracts limited weight as a public benefit at this stage. Notwithstanding this, the pedestrian openings themselves are considered acceptable in heritage terms in their own right.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
The transport, heritage, archaeological and rights-of-way advice raised no objection, while concerns remained about trees, protected species and the public right of way.
“Ruperra Castle Preservation Trust - Raise concern over Heritage Impact assessment, trees, public right of way, decision would be premature in respect of diversion of the public right of way.”
“Rights Of Way Officer - The granting of consent as requested would not affect the public right of way (which is currently obstructed at various points), but would enable a potential solution to provide public access to the grounds of Ruperra Castle, via a safer alternative route. Given the planning process and the public right of way matters are separate, whether the planning application is premature or not might be considered irrelevant.”
Officer report
Concerns from the public
Six representations raised concerns about views, accessibility, green infrastructure, heritage, trees, the circular walk and whether the footpath diversion was premature.
“Response: Six representations have been received. A local ward member has requested that the application be brought before committee.”
“- Impact on Public Right of Way and the Rhymney River circular walk. - Would decrease views of the castle. - Restrict accessibility width at the entrance points including accessibility for mobility scooters. - Premature to a possible footpath diversion, issues with proposed diversion route. - Planning Policy Wales advises the planning system must protect the provision of green infrastructure.”
Officer report
The committee considered it
The planning case officer presented the application and updated members on representations received after the officer report was completed.
“The Planning Case Officer presented the application and updated members on representations received following completion of the report, with it confirmed in the accompanying report that the recommendation in respect of the proposal had taken full account of, and was in conformity with, both Future Wales and Planning Policy Wales Edition 12.”
Minutes
The vote
Members moved and seconded approval subject to the officer’s conditions, and the motion passed with 12 votes for, none against and one abstention.
“Following consideration of the application it was moved and seconded that, subject to the conditions contained in the Officer’s report, the recommendation be approved. By way of Microsoft Forms (and in noting there were 12 For, 0 Against and 1 Abstention) this was agreed by the majority present.”
Minutes
The decision
The application was granted subject to the stated conditions and advisory notes concerning bats and public rights of way.
“(i) Subject to the conditions contained in the Officer’s report, the application be GRANTED.”
“The applicant is reminded that it is an offence to obstruct a public right of way. There are three public rights of way in the area of this application, one of which, Footpath 1 Llanfedw, is obstructed. The planning permission does not authorise the stopping up or diversion of the public rights of way.”
Minutes
Conditions and advice
Conditions require approved plans, tree protection, heritage recording and construction methods, wall reinstatement, and details of gates and equipment.
“02) The development shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans and documents: - Location Plan, drawing reference AL.0.01 revision C; - Proposed: North Boundary Wall Plan and Elevations, drawing reference AL.NG.111; - Proposed: South Drive Entrance - Plan and Elevations, drawing reference AL.SG.110 rev C; REASON: To ensure that the development is carried out only as approved by the Local Planning Authority.”
“07) Full details of all gates, ironmongery, finishes and automation equipment, including fixing methods and below-ground elements, shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority prior to installation. REASON: To preserve the special interest of the listed building in accordance with the Historic Environment (Wales) Act 2023.”
Officer report
Sources
- Caerphilly Planning Committee minutes, 8 April 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Caerphilly's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Caerphilly Planning Committee
- Council
- Caerphilly
- Date
- Wednesday 8 April 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- 12 for, 0 against, 1 abstained
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Caerphilly committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
28 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.