Demolition of listed school at Wood Top C Of E School, Cambridge Street, Burnley
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Burnley Development Control Committee on 9 Oct 2025.
What was proposed
The application sought listed building consent to demolish the school, retain the railings, wall and gate, and reuse building fabric where appropriate.
“The school building and its forecourt walls, piers, railings and overthrow are grade II listed. There is a carpark to the north, which is accessed via Burdett Street. There is an area of grassland to the west of the former school site, which was formerly occupied by a pair of villas fronting Accrington Road and a terrace row fronting Cog Lane.”
“Proposal: The application seeks listed building consent for the demolition of the school building The railings, wall and gate will remain in situ and fabric from the demolished building used within the scheme where appropriate.”
Officer report
The site and its history
The site is about 0.35 hectares and includes a Grade II listed former school, with earlier permissions for conversion, housing and community use.
“Site Description: The application site relates to around 0.35 hectare of land located north of Accrington Road (A679), Burnley. It falls southwards by around 2 metres (m) and is bound by Cambridge Street and Burdett Street to the east, Cog Lane to the west and Bartle Green to the north. The site includes Wood Top Primary School, which is a former Church of England, gothic revival school dated from 1837 with later additions.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended listed building consent because substantial public benefits and the paragraph 214 tests were considered to outweigh the loss of the listed building.
“In the absence of any other reasonable options for the building it is considered that these factors would outweigh the loss of the listed building.”
“Considerable weight has been given to the harm caused by the loss of the listed building however there are significant benefits of the scheme proposed under the concurrent full planning application that will outweigh the harm and the tests at paragraph 214 of the NPPF have been met.”
Officer report
Heritage impact and justification
Demolition would cause substantial harm through the total loss of the listed building, but officers considered renovation and alternative uses financially unviable.
“Assessment of impact The proposal would result in the total loss of the listed building except for the boundary walls and gate. The Heritage Statement concludes that this would result in substantial harm, which is agreed, including by Historic England and Historic Buildings and Places, and a matter of great weight. Therefore, it is necessary to consider whether the relevant tests are passed or whether the harm and loss is necessary to achieve substantial public benefits.”
“As such it is considered that the only viable option to allow the redevelopment of this site is demolition of the listed building.”
Officer report
What consultees said
Heritage consultees questioned the justification for demolition, while other advice supported conditions, further information, salvage and recording measures.
“Previous proposals for the site have involved retention or partial retention and conversion of the school building, which would avoid the total loss of the listed asset. We advise that further justification is needed on why it is not possible to partially retain the building, or why a more practical or viable housing type has not been proposed.”
“LCC Historic Environment (on the Full application) – Demolition should be seen as a last resort and only permitted after it has been clearly demonstrated that all other options have been considered and proven not to be visible. The absence of the information recommended in the Structural Condition Survey Report suggests that this remains to be done.”
Officer report
What residents said
One objection raised highway safety, disturbance during construction and vermin, although these matters were not considered material to listed building consent.
“Whilst these comments are noted they are not considered material to the assessment of the listed building consent but echo comments made on the full application.”
Officer report
The committee decision
The application was approved subject to conditions, including recording and analysis of the building and submission of the record to the historic environment record.
“That the application be approved subject to conditions.”
Minutes
Councillors at the meeting
- Mohammed IshtiaqChairIndependentFor(no vote against recorded)
- Martyn HurtVice-ChairGreenFor(no vote against recorded)
- Gordon BirtwistleLib DemFor(no vote against recorded)
- Joanne BroughtonConservativeFor(no vote against recorded)
- Sue GrahamLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- John HarbourLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- Bill HorrocksLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- Jacqueline InckleLib DemFor(no vote against recorded)
- Anne KellyLib DemFor(no vote against recorded)
- Mike SteelConservativeFor(no vote against recorded)
- Mark TownsendLab Co-opFor(no vote against recorded)
- Andy WaddingtonLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
The minutes record this decision with no vote against, so each member present for this item is shown as voting for it.
Apologies Alan Hosker Reform UK, Shah Hussain Independent, Jack Launer Green, Lubna Khan Independent
Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.
Sources
- Burnley Development Control Committee minutes, 9 October 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Burnley's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Burnley
- Date
- Thursday 9 October 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Councillors
- 12Labour 4Lib Dem 3Conservative 2Green 1Independent 1Lab Co-op 1Show votes
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Burnley committee decisions →
This committee's year
14 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.