217-home residential development at Langwith Road, Bolsover
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Bolsover Planning Committee on 18 Feb 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed 217 homes with open space, access roads, landscaping, infrastructure and connections to neighbouring roads.
“The application is for the residential development of 217 homes with associated open space, vehicular access roads, landscaping and infrastructure (including street connections to Foxglove Drive and Buckthorn Drive).”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The approximately eight-hectare site contained a riding school, bungalow, stables, yard, arena and paddocks, and was bounded by roads and housing.
“The site comprises a parcel of land of approximately eight hectares to the east of Bolsover, bound by Rotherham Road to the east, Langwith Road to the south, residential development on St Lawrence Avenue to the west and the newly constructed Keepmoat residential development to the north; which together with this application site forms a residential allocation within the Local Plan for Bolsover District.”
“The site is currently occupied by Villa Mar Riding School comprising a bungalow, stables, yard and outdoor riding arena at the centre south of the site with surrounding grassed paddocks. The land allocation also includes Fourways Garage on the eastern edge and the residential properties of 122 Langwith Road and Dunedin House on the southern edge of the site, however Fourways Garage and Dunedin House are excluded from this planning application.”
Officer report
Earlier planning history
Earlier applications included a refused outline scheme and a conditionally approved residential development of up to 360 homes.
“18/00573/OUT Refused Outline application for residential development including the demolition of existing buildings…”
“13/00209/OUTMAJ Granted Conditionally Residential development comprising up to 360 dwellings with public open spaces, an area suitable for employment development (which could potentially include a 60 bed care home, a children's day nursery and Class B1 offices and/or light industrial units) and associated infrastructure. Demolition of two existing dwellings and partial realignment of Mooracre Lane.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because the site was allocated for housing, the design was acceptable, affordable housing was provided, and viability limited contributions.
“The applicant is proposing to meet the Council’s requirement for 10% affordable housing in a policy compliant manner. However, the proposal is not able for viability reasons to meet all of the requested infrastructure financial obligations, in particular Derbyshire County Council’s education, health care, library stock and green space and sports contributions.”
“Ultimately, whether a proposal represents sustainable development is a matter of planning judgement. As such, based on the Council’s Local Plan position it is deemed that on balance a decision to approve would be reasonable given that the proposal is part of a Local Plan housing allocation and the proposal would contribute to both general and affordable housing supply and make the maximum amount of financial contributions that can be viably made to meet a number of local…”
Officer report
Objections and concerns
Forty-two representations were received, including 41 objections concerning traffic, drainage, flooding, infrastructure, amenity, wildlife, open space and the development’s scale.
“Loss of light to neighbouring properties • Loss of privacy to neighbouring properties • Loss of green space and lack of green space on the proposed development • Cumulative impact with all other development approved in Bolsover • Increased pressure on local infrastructure • Increased congestion • Increased number of road traffic accidents • More potholes • Limited parking within Bolsover…”
Officer report
Committee consideration
The committee considered the application and was asked to address a typographical error that did not affect the earlier resolution.
“Committee considered a report in relation to the above application presented by the Development Management and Land Charges Manager, who gave details of the application and highlighted the location and features of the site and key issues.”
“The item was being brought back to the Committee’s attention for Members to note and consider a typographical error in the report of 1 st October 2025 and confirm that it had no impact on the resolution made.”
Minutes
The vote
One councillor abstained from the vote on endorsing the earlier resolution.
“When put to a vote, Councillor Rob Hiney-Saunders abstained.”
Minutes
The decision
The committee noted the error and endorsed the previous resolution to grant permission subject to the specified legal agreement.
“Moved by Councillor Phil Smith and seconded by Councillor Tom Munro RESOLVED that Planning Committee Members noted the typographical error in the Consultation section of the previous Committee Report and endorsed that it did not change the resolution at the 1 st October 2025 Planning Committee meeting.”
Minutes
Sources
- Bolsover Planning Committee minutes, 18 February 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Bolsover's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Bolsover Planning Committee
- Council
- Bolsover
- Date
- Wednesday 18 February 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Bolsover committee decisions →
This committee's year
20 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.