Reactivating a vacant supermarket unit at Homebase store, Birmingham
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Birmingham Planning Committee on 23 Oct 2025.
No officer report was published for this decision; this summary is from the committee minutes.
An objection on highways and noise
A letter of objection said the case officer report failed to address highway safety, relevant policy, noise from plant equipment, and withheld the evidence base on highways.
“2024/06059/PA The Area Planning Manager (North) confirmed the following updates: • Members should note a further letter of objection was received on the 17 th of October 2025, this detailed the following areas of concern: -The case officer report fails to address highway safety considerations on the adjacent highway network, -Fails to have regard to key relevant policy in the development plan, -Fails to assess the noise impact considerations arising from fixed and other plant…”
Minutes
The applicant responds to the objection
The applicant said the objector selectively referenced policy, that the scheme reactivates a vacant retail unit, and that the highway authority raised no concerns.
“OFFICIAL -The objectors selectively reference planning policies to support their concerns and overlook policies the proposals meet. -The application reactivates a vacant retail unit in New Oscott District Centre. -Policy TP22 supports appropriately scaled convenience retail within centres. Enhancements to public realm and connectivity further support compliance with TP22 – which fall under a new separate application.”
Minutes
Further objection and applicant rebuttal
The applicant rebutted the highway objections, and a further letter of objection raised issues already covered in the case officer report.
“-The applicants also submitted a rebuttal to the claims by the objector with reference to their highway related objections – however these are adequately addressed within the original case officer report. • In addition to this, one further letter of objection was received on 21 st…”
“October 2025 – the issues raised here have already been referenced within the case officer report. • In addition, a leaflet was sent to Members of committee by the application, on the 21 st of October 2025, setting out the benefits of the scheme, which include but is not limited to: -An overview of the application. -What is being proposed; -Public consultation and Engagement; -Local Economic Benefits; and -Sustainability Commitments.”
Minutes
Planning permission approved
The committee resolved that planning permission be approved subject to the conditions set out in the report.
“OFFICIAL That planning permission be approved subject to the conditions set out in the report. OTHER URGENT BUSINESS Councillor Davis proposed the following motion ‘The Planning Committee calls on BCC Cabinet and Managing Director to reiterate support for existing officers efforts to protect our city’s British heritage, ensure that extra resources are provided and a long term plan is in place to facilitate additional recruitment for conservation enforcement and heritage…”
Minutes
Sources
- Birmingham Planning Committee minutes, 23 October 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Birmingham's committee minutes. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Birmingham Planning Committee
- Council
- Birmingham
- Date
- Thursday 23 October 2025
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- 10 for, 0 against
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Birmingham committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
12 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.