Burial ground access and parking at College Farm Equestrian Centre, Keysoe, Bedford

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Bedford Planning Committee on 19 Jan 2026.

24/02261/FULApproved

What was proposed

The application sought a new access from Keysoe Row West and a 20-space car park for the woodland burial ground.

“The application site is located on Keysoe Row West to the east of Keysoe Row and equidistant between the junction of Church Road and B660. The site is located in open countryside and is currently formed of a grass verge and woodland planning which then becomes woodland that forms part of the Woodland Burial Ground which is owned and operated by the St Albans Woodland Burial Trust.”

“This application seeks planning permission for the construction of a new access point off Keysoe Row West to the St Albans Woodland Burial Ground and a new 20 space car park. The access and car park would not connect into any existing hardsurfacing within the Woodland Burial Ground.”

Officer report

Earlier applications

Earlier proposals included an approved burial ground and parking, while a similar access and car park proposal was refused before being redesigned.

“*23/02492/FUL - The construction of a new access point off Keysoe Row West to the St Albans Woodland Burial Ground and new 20 space car park. Refused. See section 2.1 for more details.”

“*06/01378/FUL - Change of use of land to woodland burial ground with associated car parking and extension to roadway and formation of new footpath. Approved - (included car park for 20 vehicles)”

Officer report

What was recommended

Permission was recommended because accessibility and separation benefits, public support and reduced visual harm outweighed the countryside impact.

“The application also has public support which is evidenced through the 70 public responses as well as support in principle from the Parish Council and a local church leader. It is also noted that scheme has some public objection which has been discussed through this report.”

“The revised design including the reduction of the hardstanding for the access junction and access road and the alteration of surfacing material for the car park has decreased the visual impact of the development since the previous refusal. Additional supporting information including the above mentioned have also given additional strength to the material considerations which weigh in favour of granting planning permission.”

Officer report

Advice and public comments

The parish council supported the application, highways raised no objection subject to conditions, and 70 comments supported it against 12 objections.

“- 85 - Parish Council *That the proposed parking is at least equal to the existing. *Responsibility for maintenance of the car park and access road. *Requested height limit on vehicles entering.”

“These can be conditioned as a part of the planning decision to ensure the working methods are complied with should the council be minded to approve the application.”

Officer report

Main concerns considered

The assessment identified some visual harm and tree loss but found acceptable effects on neighbours, highways, biodiversity and flooding with conditions.

“- 93 - Overall, the proposal does result in some erosion of the rural character of the area and introduces a gap in the trees line and an access point where there currently isn't one. It is acknowledged however that the reduced bellmouth of the access as well as the change in surfacing materials will reduce the level of impact and with conditions the boundary treatment can be controlled to be sympathetic to the rural location and in order to safeguard any further impact from…”

“Overall, the proposal is identified to cause some visual harm, this level has been reduced by the above-mentioned design revisions since the previous refusal. In this case other material consideration (which are discussed within this report and summarised within the conclusion section) are afforded significant weight and are considered to outweigh the visual harm identified.”

Officer report

The committee decision

Permission was granted in accordance with the recommendation, with an additional informative about the access junction’s kerbed radii and granite-effect materials.

“In regard to Condition 3 (Junction/Access Details) it is recommended that the access junction shall have 2m kerbed radii using short textured concrete granite-effect kerbs with granite setts along the channel line’.”

“In regard to Condition 3 (Junction/Access Details) it is recommended that the access junction shall have 2m kerbed radii using short textured concrete granite-effect kerbs with granite setts along the channel line…”

Minutes

Sources

  • Bedford Planning Committee minutes, 19 January 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Bedford's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Bedford
Date
Monday 19 January 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

17 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →