Two-storey detached dwelling at 195 Alfreton Road, Underwood
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Ashfield Planning Committee on 11 Nov 2025.
What was proposed
The application sought permission for a two-storey detached dwelling on land next to 195 Alfreton Road.
“The Application This is a full planning application for the erection of a two-storey detached dwelling located on Alfreton Road, Underwood.”
Officer report
Site history
Earlier permission was granted for a dwelling, but construction did not follow the approved plans or discharge pre-commencement conditions.
“In 2022 conditional consent was granted for the erection of a two-storey dwelling at the site under application V/2021/0563. Works commenced on the site which did not accord with the approved plans and pre-commencement conditions had not been discharged. This application has been submitted to resolve the issues.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
Highways and the tree officer raised no objection, while the Coal Authority raised no objection after drilling and grouting works were reported.
“Coal Authority - Further information required - Site falls within defined development high risk area, more specifically information indicates that a coal seam outcrops at or close to the surface in the vicinity of the application site. Seam may have been worked in the past. - Application is accompanied by a ‘Rotary probe investigation for shallow mine workings’ (30 Jan 2023, prepared by Erda Associated Ltd).”
“- Drill and Grout Completion Report (April 2025) was submitted. Document confirms that a drilling and grouting exercise has been carried out on a grid pattern across the site, covering the new dwelling footprint and shared driveway. Works were carried out under Mining Authority permit. - Report indicates that grout takes were low. Report concludes that the treatment is considered to have been successful and the site is considered to be suitable for the proposed development.”
Officer report
Residents’ views
Residents objected to the dwelling’s height, scale, privacy, amenity, access, parking, drainage, construction impacts and differences from the earlier approval.
“- Procedural irregularities, breaches of planning conditions, setting precedent, wrong address, notification not given, resident not consulted, question whether development lawfully commenced - Impact on visual amenity, character of area - Impact on residential amenity - Height is greater than neighbouring properties, excessive in scale…”
“- Elevated footprint and raised patio - Impact on privacy - Oversized windows and doors - Differs from original approval - Impact from overlooking - Side windows not obscure glazed like previous approval - Materials not in keeping with area - Inaccurate plans - Misleading information submitted - Impact on Green Belt - Impact from construction, noise - Obstruction of legal access - Damage to property - Overbearing - Impact on natural light, overshadowing - Property is almost…”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because the proposal’s effects were unlikely to be significantly worse than those of the previously approved scheme.
“Overall, whilst it is acknowledged that the proposal may have some impacts on neighbouring properties, it is considered that these are unlikely to be significantly worse than what would have been experienced from the originally approved scheme and are considered not to be so significant that a refusal on the grounds of amenity could be justified.”
“Conclusion: Having assessed the submitted information and comments received against all relevant policies and material considerations it is considered that the proposal will have some impacts however they are unlikely to be anymore significant than what may occur from the previously approved scheme. As such the application is recommended for approval subject to the below conditions.”
Officer report
Committee consideration
A motion for conditional consent was moved and seconded in accordance with the officer recommendation.
“V/2025/0266, [name withheld], Two Storey Detached Dwelling, Land Adjacent 195 Alfreton Road, Underwood, Nottinghamshire. NG16 5GX”
“It was moved and seconded that conditional consent be granted, as per the officer’s recommendation contained in the report.”
Minutes
Conditions attached
The recommended conditions covered materials, approved plans, obscure and non-opening bathroom glazing, and surface-water and foul-sewage drainage.
“The window(s) in the side elevation(s)at first floor serving the bathroom shall be glazed in obscure glass and be non-opening below 1.7m above the room…”
“The development hereby permitted shall not be occupied until drainage plans for the disposal of surface water and foul sewage have been submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. The scheme shall be implemented in accordance with the approved details before the development is first brought into use.”
Officer report
Sources
- Ashfield Planning Committee minutes, 11 November 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Ashfield's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Ashfield Planning Committee
- Council
- Ashfield
- Date
- Tuesday 11 November 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Ashfield committee decisions →
This committee's year
9 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.