8 dwellinghouses and access at Land East Of Knock Farmhouse Upper, Lochgair
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Argyll Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee on 17 Dec 2025.
What was proposed
The application sought eight detached homes, a vehicular access, adoptable access road, parking, drainage and service connections.
“Reference No: 22/00680/PP Planning Hierarchy: Local Applicant: MacLeod Construction Ltd. Proposal: Erection of 8 dwellinghouses and formation of vehicular access. Site Address: Land East of Knock Farmhouse, Upper Lochgair, Argyll and Bute.”
“(i) Development Requiring Express Planning Permission • Change of use of land to Class 9 Houses • Erection of 8 dwellinghouses • Formation of new vehicular access junction with trunk road • Formation of adoptable access road • Formation of vehicular parking • Surface drainage infrastructure…”
Officer report
Earlier applications
Earlier proposals included a withdrawn application for eight homes, an approved housing application, an approved access application and a withdrawn two-home proposal.
“10/01847/PP – “Erection of 5 terrace, 4 semi-detached and 1 detached dwelling-houses and formation of access (amended plan)” Application approved 28.11.2013”
“12/00898/PP – “Formation of access to service the drainage infrastructure (septic tank) (relative to application reference 10/01847/PP for housing)”. Application approved 28.11.2013”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because the housing allocation established the principle of development and submitted information addressed road safety subject to conditions.
“The application is for planning permission for a residential development on a site allocated for housing within the adopted Argyll and Bute Local Development Plan (2024). The principle of residential development has therefore been established by the site’s allocation (ref.H3029).”
“On the matter of road safety, sufficient information has now been submitted with the application to demonstrate that the proposed access junction with the A83 trunk road meets Design Standards as required by the Trunk Road Authority subject to planning conditions.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
Statutory consultees raised no objections subject to conditions, including measures for access, drainage, flooding, construction noise, contamination and archaeology.
“(25 th July 2025) – following the applicant’s submission of a traffic speed survey and revised plans, Transport Scotland have no objections to the scheme subject to the inclusion of planning conditions to ensure the access is constructed to a layout and type of construction as approved by Transport Scotland, agreement of the details for the pedestrian link and that drainage shall no connect to trunk road drainage systems.”
“Area Roads Officer (19 th May 2022) – has no objections subject to conditions relating to access construction to adoptable standards, sufficient car parking spaces, a pedestrian footway link and restriction of a vehicular link between the new development road and the existing private road.”
Officer report
Public views
Forty-one respondents contributed, with 35 objections and six general comments covering policy, facilities, design, scale, roads, flooding, landscape, infrastructure and amenity.
“At the time of writing, representations have been received from 41 respondents in relation to this planning application. A total of 35 respondents raise objection and 6 respondents provide general comments.”
“Comments on Policy • Contrary to LDP DM1 as it exceeds “small scale” which is defined as not exceeding 5 houses, within villages and minor settlements. • Council’s allocation appears to support the enlarged application contrary to Lochgair’s size. • No masterplan has been agreed as per previous permission requests • Will set precedence for the development of the remainder of the site with further housing.”
Officer report
Hearing proposal
The planning authority considered that the representations and assessment gave members enough information and that a discretionary hearing would add no value.
“A total of 41 public representations have been received in response to this planning application. 35 objections and 6 respondents raise concern. A representation has also been received from Cllr Dougie Philand whom requests a pre-determination hearing is undertaken. Consideration therefore requires to be given to the benefits of holding a pre-determination hearing.”
“It is therefore, not considered that the objections raise any complex or technical issues that have not been addressed in the Report of Handling, and it is not considered that a discretionary local hearing would add value to the planning process.”
Officer report
The committee vote
Members voted on approval and on an amendment for a pre-determination hearing; the Chair used a casting vote after an equality of votes.
“To agree to hold a pre-determination hearing.”
“On there being an equality of votes, the Chair made his casting vote in favour of the Motion.”
Minutes
Conditions
Approved subject to 1 condition, set out in the minutes.
Sources
- Argyll Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee minutes, 17 December 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Argyll's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Argyll
- Date
- Wednesday 17 December 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- 5 for, 4 against
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Argyll committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
6 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.