14 Cressington Drive,Sutton Coldfield,Birmingham,B74 2SU Data via plota.co.uk

2026/01939/PA - Householder Approved

Proposal

Installation of gates to front driveway Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
13 Apr 2026
✓
Approved
5 Jun 2026

Approved on 5 Jun 2026 · Last checked 25 Sept 2026

Site constraints 14

Four Oaks Conservation Area conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Article 4 direction
City Wide Hmo. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Tree preservation order: The Birmingham (No. 1 Hartopp Road, Four Oaks, Sutton Coldfield) Tpo 1979
Consent is needed before work on protected trees.
Not every council has published its orders as open data, so no order shown is not proof there is none.
Heritage at risk: Four Oaks
On the register of historic places assessed as at risk.
A designated building, monument, park or conservation area assessed as at risk from neglect, decay or development. Proposals that secure its future are looked on favourably.
Historic England ↗
Air quality management area: Birmingham AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
2 listed buildings within 150 m
Nearest: Redlands, Grade II, 10 m away · 2 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 2 with distances
Historic England ↗
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
National nature reserve 240 m away: Sutton Park
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Also on the record
SSSI 240 m away: Sutton Park SSSI; Radon affected area, class 2; Nature improvement area: Birmingham and the Black Country; Scheduled monument 240 m away: Medieval deerpark and other archaeological remains in Sutton Park; Registered park or garden 240 m away: Sutton Park; Inside the Royal Sutton Coldfield built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Birmingham - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Birmingham
Application type
Householder
Postcode
B74 2SU
Received
13 Apr 2026
Validated
13 Apr 2026
Ward
Sutton Four Oaks
Case officer
Show
Decision
APPROVE SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS
Decision date
5 Jun 2026
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 53 days from validation, about the council's usual 54 days. Approved, as 85% of extensions here are.

59%decided within 8 weeks
85%approved
1,628decided in the last year

Plota live figures for extensions decided by Birmingham in the last twelve months, from validation. Birmingham decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
6 May 2026
Comments by
4 Jun 2026
Statutory expiry
8 Jun 2026
Birmingham
Planning Authority Score
2.2/10
Poor
#265 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Birmingham is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #245 out of 296. 47% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (86%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Birmingham decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
82%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #244 of 296
86%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #240 of 296
48%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #245 of 296
47%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #205 of 296
71%
Minor dwellings approved
98 decided (1-9 homes)
94%
Major dwellings approved
33 decided (10+ homes)
56%
Change of use approved
261 decided
3,472
Total decisions
619 refused in the year to March 2026

Freehold boundary: © Crown copyright and database rights 2026, HM Land Registry. Polygons © Crown copyright and database rights 2026 Ordnance Survey 100026316. Conditions of use