2 Rose Cottage Harper Royd Lane Sowerby Bridge Calderdale HX6 3QQ Data via plota.co.uk

26/00523/HSE - Householder Approved

Proposal

demolition of front conservatory to facilitate extension Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
9 Jun 2026
Validated
7 Jul 2026
Consultation
8 Jul 2026
Approved
4 Sept 2026

Approved on 4 Sept 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 5 Sept 2026

Site constraints 4

Green belt: South and West Yorkshire
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm.
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Predicted from the national soil map. The older provisional map, which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 4. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Nature recovery project: Bradford and South Pennines.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Calderdale - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Calderdale
Application type
Householder
Postcode
HX6 3QQ
Received
9 Jun 2026
Validated
7 Jul 2026
Ward
Greetland
Parish
Not In A Parish
Case officer
Show
Target decision
1 Sept 2026
Decision
Permit
Decision date
4 Sept 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Setsquare Architecture Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 59 days from validation, about the council's usual 56 days. Approved, as 74% of demolitions here are.

55%decided within 8 weeks
74%approved
32decided in the last year

Plota live figures for demolitions decided by Calderdale in the last twelve months, from validation. Calderdale decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

2 neighbours consulted · Last counted 5 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14991557
Neighbours
8 Jul 2026
Comments by
29 Jul 2026
Site or press notice
28 Jul 2026
Env. assessment
No
Calderdale
Planning Authority Score
2.7/10
Poor
#240 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Calderdale ranks #193 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. 50% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (87%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Calderdale decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
86%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #192 of 296
87%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #229 of 296
58%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #193 of 296
50%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #223 of 296
73%
Minor dwellings approved
103 decided (1-9 homes)
82%
Major dwellings approved
11 decided (10+ homes)
89%
Change of use approved
61 decided
856
Total decisions
121 refused in the year to March 2026