Garden room and parking at Land Adjacent To 1 Coneyberry, Reigate
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Reigate Planning Committee on 3 Jun 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought residential garden use, a garden room, boundary fencing and additional parking on land beside the property.
“This is a full planning application for a change of use of land to residential garden land, the erection of a garden room, boundary fencing and use of land for additional parking.”
Officer report
Officers’ assessment
Officers considered the land suitable for residential use and found the design, neighbour impact, trees and flooding acceptable with conditions.
“The entirety of the site lies within the urban area and the parcel of land proposed to be incorporated as residential garden/parking land ancillary to the application property is not designated as Urban Open Space. It is a relatively small parcel of land and not considered to be of any significant amenity value. Therefore, the proposed incorporation of the land as residential land for the application property is considered to be acceptable in principle.”
“The proposed 1m tall front boundary treatments would broadly reflect the character of the street, retaining openness to the property frontage and streetscene. The proposed garden structure would be set back from the highway and appear as an inconspicuous garden building. There would be a spread of hardstanding to accommodate two additional off-street parking spaces however the property frontage would not appear unduly harsh or urbanised within the wider context.”
Officer report
Consultation and representations
The Tree Officer had no objection subject to tree protection, and no responses were received from neighbouring properties.
“Tree Officer: No Objection subject to a condition is imposed to ensure adequate tree protection measures are installed.”
“Letters were sent to neighbouring properties on 09 March 2026.”
Officer report
The committee’s discussion
The committee preferred the fence to become weathered rather than being stained.
“The Committee felt that it would be preferable for the fence to become weathered rather than being stained.”
Minutes
The decision
The committee granted permission subject to the recommendation and addendum, removing the condition relating to staining.
“RESOLVED that planning permission be GRANTED subject to conditions as per the recommendation and addendum, however the condition relating to staining be removed.”
Minutes
Sources
- Reigate Planning Committee minutes, 3 June 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Reigate's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Reigate Planning Committee
- Council
- Reigate
- Date
- Wednesday 3 June 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Reigate committee decisions →
This committee's year
29 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.