Two dwellings at 260a Hawkes Mill Lane, Coventry
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Coventry Planning Committee on 5 Mar 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought outline permission for two detached, two-storey dwellings, with only access included and other matters reserved.
“The most recent outline approval, OUT/2020/2762, was initially recommended for refusal and was refused by Planning Committee on 11 th February 2021 but was granted on appeal on 31 st July 2021 (appeal reference number APP/U4610/W/21/3269710). The proposal was an outline application to erect four dwellings with access, scale and layout considered. Two houses would be located to the east of the access road and two to the west.”
Officer report
The site
The grassland site lies in the Green Belt behind Hawkes Mill Lane and would be accessed through a private access between two homes.
“SITE DESCRIPTION The application site is located within the Green Belt, accessed via a private access which is located between 244 and 248 Hawkes Mill Lane. 244 and 248 Hawkes Mill Lane are single storey dwellings. The site is currently grass land between new built dwellings to the west and Hogs End Farm to the east. The site is screened from the wider public to the point that one is not aware of the site when traversing Hawkes Mill Lane.”
Officer report
Earlier applications
The proposal resubmitted an application refused in January 2023, following several approvals and appeals for nearby dwellings.
“INTRODUCTION This application is a resubmission of OUT/2022/3157, which was refused on 6th January 2023. The application was refused as it was considered to be inappropriate development within the Green Belt contrary to both the Coventry Local Plan 2017 and National Planning Policy Framework.”
Officer report
Officers’ recommendation
Officers recommended refusal because the development would harm Green Belt openness and character, lack sustainable access, and fail to meet planning policies.
“RECOMMENDATION Planning Committee are recommended to refuse planning permission for the reasons set out within this report.”
“REASON FOR DECISION The application site lies within the Green Belt where strict policies of restraint apply. The development of the site for two houses will cause serious harm to the Green Belt and is inappropriate development within the Green Belt. The very special circumstances that have been put forward to justify the proposal do not outweigh the harm which would be caused by the proposal.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
Environmental Protection and Ecology raised no objections subject to conditions, while the Local Highway Authority objected to the proposals.
“CONSULTATION No objections have been received from:”
“Environmental Protection (CCC)- subject to conditions in relation to a CMP (construction management plan) and Low Nox boilers and EV (electric vehicle) charging points. • Ecology (CCC)- subject to conditions in relation to lighting, biodiversity features, and a LEMP (Landscape Ecological Management Plan) Objections have been received from: • Local Highway Authority (CCC) Neighbour consultation Immediate neighbours and local councillors have been notified, and a site notice…”
Officer report
Residents’ views
Six letters objected over traffic, access, parking, wildlife, privacy, overdevelopment, Green Belt impact and noise; five letters supported the proposal.
“Six letters of objection have been received, raising the following material planning considerations: a) Increased traffic b) Concerns regarding suitability of access c) Parking provision concerns d) Loss of wildlife e) Loss of privacy to neighbours f) Overdevelopment g) Loss/ Impact upon Green Belt h) Increased noise concerns i) Lack of notification Within the letters received the following non-material planning considerations were raised, these cannot be given due…”
Officer report
Committee decision
The committee refused planning permission for the application.
“The Committee considered a report of the Strategic Lead for outline planning permission for erection of two dwellings (all matters to be reserved, except for access) (Resubmission of OUT/2022/3157). The application was recommended for refusal.”
“RESOLVED that Planning Permission for Application PL/2025/0001987 be refused.”
Minutes
Sources
- Coventry Planning Committee minutes, 5 March 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Coventry's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Coventry Planning Committee
- Council
- Coventry
- Date
- Thursday 5 March 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended refusal
- Committee decided
- Refused
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Coventry committee decisions →
This committee's year
22 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.