The Shack Stonehill Road Ottershaw KT16 0EN Data via plota.co.uk

RU.26/0620 Decided
Admin / procedural

Proposal

Certificate of Existing Lawful Development to establish the lawful planning status of the dwelling house The Shack and building works. Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.
View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
9 Jun 2026
✓
Decided
13 Jul 2026

Decided on 13 Jul 2026 · Last checked 28 Aug 2026

Documents

View the documents on the council's website ↗

Site constraints 4

Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. A site survey can differ.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
National infrastructure project about 85 m away: Southampton to London Pipeline Project
The site is about 85 m from the project boundary. Pipeline, decided. The project page says whether consent was granted.
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Runnymede - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Other new applications on this street

24 Sept 2026Pending

Hillgrove Stonehill Road Ottershaw Surrey KT16 0EN

Replacement of the three existing front dormer windows with two enlarged dormer ...

RU.26/1203
9 Sept 2026Pending

1 Oak Villas Stonehill Road Ottershaw Surrey KT16 0ER

Retrospective application for retention of green mesh fencing surrounding a foot...

RU.26/1164
27 Aug 2026Pending

Ryne Stonehill Road Ottershaw Surrey KT16 0ER

Erection of a single-storey front infill extension to form an enclosed porch and...

RU.26/1075
15 Apr 2026

Land adjacent to Sunnyside, Stonehill Road, Ottershaw, CHERTSEY, KT16 0ER and Land adjoining Sunnyside, Stonehill Road, Chertsey

Appeal against enforcement notice.

RU.26/0496

Nearby new applications

24 Sept 2026Pending

Hillgrove Stonehill Road Ottershaw Surrey KT16 0EN

Replacement of the three existing front dormer windows with two enlarged dormer ...

RU.26/1203
9 Sept 2026Pending

1 Oak Villas Stonehill Road Ottershaw Surrey KT16 0ER

Retrospective application for retention of green mesh fencing surrounding a foot...

RU.26/1164
27 Aug 2026Pending

Ryne Stonehill Road Ottershaw Surrey KT16 0ER

Erection of a single-storey front infill extension to form an enclosed porch and...

RU.26/1075

Important details

Council
Runnymede
Postcode
KT16 0EN
Received
9 Jun 2026
Validated
9 Jun 2026
Case officer
Show
Decision date
13 Jul 2026

Historical activity at this location

14 nearby applications on record - archival context, not part of the live application.

Within ~100m

Nearby activity

2022 Approved
The Portico Stonehill Road Ottershaw Surrey KT16 0EN
Single storey infill side extension.
RU.22/1913
2022 Approved
The Portico Stonehill Road Ottershaw Surrey KT16 0EN
Single storey infill side extension.
RU.22/1913
2019 Approved
The Portico Stonehill Road Ottershaw Chertsey Surrey KT16 0EN
T1 - Sweet Chestnut: re-pollard back to previous. Reason: to renew lapsed management. T2…
RU.19/0683
2019 Approved
The Portico Stonehill Road Ottershaw Chertsey Surrey KT16 0EN
T1 - Sweet Chestnut: re-pollard back to previous. Reason: to renew lapsed management. T2…
RU.19/0683
2018 Approved
Hillgrove Stonehill Road Ottershaw KT16 0EN
Change to existing plans to allow enclosed walkway to front of stable block
RU.18/1743
2017 Approved
Hillgrove Stonehill Road Ottershaw KT16 0EN
Change of use of land for the siting of a manege and erection of stables for personal use
RU.17/1882
2017 Approved
Hillgrove Stonehill Road Ottershaw KT16 0EN
Change of use of land for the siting of a manege and erection of stables for personal use
RU.17/1882
2017 Approved
Hillgrove Stonehill Road OTTERSHAW KT16 0EN
Creation of new access from Stonehill Road and associated track.
RU.17/1840
2017 Approved
Hillgrove Stonehill Road OTTERSHAW KT16 0EN
Creation of new access from Stonehill Road and associated track.
RU.17/1840
2016 Approved
Hillgrove Stonehill Road OTTERSHAW KT16 0EN
Lawful Development Certificate to establish whether the existing alterations and increase…
RU.16/1876
2016 Approved
Hillgrove Stonehill Road OTTERSHAW KT16 0EN
Open fronted timber barn (Retrospective)
RU.16/1875
2016 Refused
Hillgrove Stonehill Road Ottershaw Chertsey Surrey KT16 0EN
Amendment to Condition 7 of planning approval RU.09/0008 (Alterations and increase in hei…
RU.16/0367
2016 Approved
Stonehill Road (in front of the Portico Stonehill road) Stonehill Road Ottershaw Chertsey KT16 0EN
Works to trees on Stonehill Road (front of The Portico), trees protected by TPO No. 6
RU.16/0635
2016 Withdrawn
Hillgrove Stonehill Road OTTERSHAW KT16 0EN
Retrospective application for a 10 x 6m open frontage timber storage shed
RU.16/0612
Runnymede
Planning Authority Score
5.2/10
Average
#140 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Runnymede ranks #108 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (89%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Runnymede decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
83%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #242 of 296
89%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #208 of 296
72%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #108 of 296
36%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #113 of 296
66%
Minor dwellings approved
74 decided (1-9 homes)
82%
Major dwellings approved
11 decided (10+ homes)
55%
Change of use approved
11 decided
661
Total decisions
110 refused in the year to March 2026
Source: MHCLG planning statistics · See full council rankings