Barn conversion to dwelling at Redundant Barn Adjacent To Burnthouse Cottage Northmostown, Sidmouth

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by East Devon Planning Committee on 9 Jun 2026.

25/2502/FULRefused

What was proposed

The application proposed converting a thresher barn into a three-bedroom, six-person dwelling with a large rear extension, parking and landscaping.

“The application seeks permission to convert an existing thresher barn into a 3-bedroom, 6-person dwelling. The proposal would introduce a large, glazed window on the front elevation which would fill an existing opening which is currently a large timber door. The front elevation would also feature a centrally positioned roof light.”

“The rear elevation would see a large, single storey, sedum-roofed extension introduced. The bulk of the extension would measure approximately 10.8 metres in width, 5.8 metres in length and 3.4 metres in height. The extension would partially wrap around the side elevation. The overall footprint of the extension measures at approximately 65m 2 , which represents a doubling of the existing footprint.”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The barn is in the countryside within the East Devon National Landscape, on a steep and prominent site beside several Grade II listed buildings.

“The site is located 1.5 miles South of Northmostown and approximately 1 mile(by foot) from Colaton Raleigh to the East. The plot measures approximately 580m 2 and is located within the East Devon National Landscape.”

“A site visit was conducted on 14/01/2026 where it was observed that the site slopes relatively steeply down from the Southwest to Northeast. This means that the barn sits in an elevated position in comparison to the adjacent buildings. The site would be considered prominent within its locality and holds a visual relationship with the adjacent farm buildings.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

The parish council and ward member supported the proposal, while trees and environmental health raised no concerns and conservation and ecology objected or required more information.

“The proposed new extension will not be very visible from the front and as the proposal seeks to retain the existing walls and structure the appearance will be of a traditional style barn design. Initial concerns regarding Barn Owl and bat roosting sites seem to have been mitigated as detailed in the reports. The Parish Council therefore supports this application.”

“Environmental Health 23/01/26 - I have considered the application and do not anticipate any environmental health concerns…”

Officer report

Residents’ views

Two third-party objections raised concerns about visual impact, neighbour amenity, heritage effects and missing information.

“Two letters of objection have been received from third parties which raise issues relating to visual impact, neighbour amenity, heritage impacts and missing information.”

Officer report

Main planning concerns

The extension, excavation, parking and domestic features would erode the barn’s agricultural character and harm the protected landscape and nearby heritage assets.

“In addition to the parking area, a pathway to the dwelling will be created. This pathway will lead directly to the extension which projects beyond the side elevation of the barn. The extension would be finished in blackened timber cladding, feature large amounts of glazing and afforded a small, terraced area to its South (side) elevation. The extension, by virtue of its footprint, has been considered a substantial addition to the barn.”

“These alterations and landscaping would collectively domesticate a structure with an otherwise robust and uncluttered appearance. The introduction of openings, a large extension, roof lights, parking area and a domestic garden space would dilute the strong characteristics of a simple agricultural structure that is recognised as holding cultural heritage value.”

Officer report

The committee vote

Councillors Wragg, Hunt and Davey voted for refusal, while Councillors Barlow and Hughes voted against, with no abstentions.

“A recorded vote was taken. Councillors Wragg, Hunt and Davey voted in favour. Councillors Barlow and Hughes voted against. No abstentions.”

Minutes

The decision

The committee refused the application in accordance with the officer recommendation, but removed ecology as a reason for refusal.

“RESOLVED: Refused in accordance with officer recommendation, subject to the removal of Reason 4 (ecology) from the reasons for refusal, as set out in the amended recommendation.”

Minutes

Sources

  • East Devon Planning Committee minutes, 9 June 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of East Devon's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
East Devon
Date
Tuesday 9 June 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended refusal
Committee decided
Refused
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

42 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 5 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →