Single-storey side extension at 17 Third Avenue, Bexhill
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Rother Planning Committee on 12 Feb 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought to replace a garage and side extension with a single-storey extension containing a front garage and rear dining room.
“Permission is sought to replace the existing prefabricated garage and side extension with a new single-storey side extension comprising a garage to the front and a dining room extension to its rear. The proposed extension would be partially detached with the forward-facing garage separated from the side wall of the main dwelling in order to maintain the existing windows contained within the dwelling's side.”
Officer report
The site
The site is a detached bungalow with a prefabricated garage in a mainly residential area, within Bexhill’s development boundary.
“The application site is a detached bungalow with a prefabricated garage to its side, situated on the southern side of Third Avenue, and located in a predominantly residential area of Bexhill. The wider street scene consists of similar-scaled dwellings.”
“The site is situated within the development boundary for Bexhill as defined with the Rother Development and Site Allocations Local Plan (DaSA).”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because the design was acceptable, the extension suited the locality, and neighbouring privacy and amenities would not be demonstrably affected.
“The nearest affected property is the adjacent dwelling to the east, No.15 whilst the proposed extension would project closer to the neighbour, it would maintain a separation distance of approximately 2m between the dwellings, thereby maintaining a reasonable gap. No windows are proposed in the side elevation so there are no overlooking issues.”
“Overall, the proposed extension and alterations would be of an acceptable scale and design, in keeping with the character of the host dwelling and the locality. Additionally, and subject to condition, owing to the single-storey profile and separation distance with the adjacent dwelling, the development is not considered to demonstrably affect the neighbour’s privacy and amenities.”
Officer report
Committee discussion
The committee supported the officer recommendation, and a motion to grant permission subject to conditions was proposed and seconded.
“The Planning Committee was supportive of the officer’s recommendation, subject to the conditions as outlined below.”
“Councillor Gray moved the motion to GRANT (Full Planning Permission) subject to conditions and this was seconded by Councillor Chowdhury.”
Minutes
The vote
The motion was carried unanimously, with eight members voting in favour.
“The motion was declared CARRIED (8 for / unanimous).”
Minutes
Sources
- Rother Planning Committee minutes, 12 February 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Rother's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Rother Planning Committee
- Council
- Rother
- Date
- Thursday 12 February 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- Unanimous
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Rother committee decisions →
This committee's year
24 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.