28 Hampton Road, Chingford, London, E4 8NJ Data via plota.co.uk
Description
Prior approval for the construction of a single storey rear extension which would extend 3.90m beyond the rear wall of the existing dwelling, a maximum height of 3.00m and an eaves height of 2.90m. Data via plota.co.uk
Work with planning data? Every application in Waltham Forest - and every UK council - as a live feed or API. About Plota's data service
Other new applications on this street
112 Hampton Road, Chingford, London, E4 8NR
Submission of details pursuant to condition 11 (water reduction) attached to pla...
83 Hampton Road, Chingford, London, E4 8NP
Lawful development certificate (Proposed) for the construction of a replacement ...
41 Hampton Road, Chingford, London, E4 8NH
Construction of a single storey rear extension.
Nearby new applications
48 Frances Road, Chingford, London, E4 9DL
Subdivision of the land at 48 Frances Road and construction of a two storey deta...
BURNSIDE SECONDARY SCHOOL, 2 Burnside Avenue, Chingford, London, E4 8YJ
Submission of details pursuant to condition 11 (Sound Insulation) attached to pl...
10 Chingford Mount Road, Chingford, London, E4 9AB
Submission of details pursuant to condition 10 (means of enclosure), condition 2...
WAR MEMORIAL PARK Chingford Mount Road, E4 8LR
Submission of details pursuant to condition 4 (refuse, waste and recycling) and ...
112 Hampton Road, Chingford, London, E4 8NR
Submission of details pursuant to condition 11 (water reduction) attached to pla...
BURNSIDE SECONDARY SCHOOL, 2 Burnside Avenue, Chingford, London, E4 8YJ
Submission of details pursuant to condition 10 (slab level details), condition 1...
Waltham Forest is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #80 out of 296. Only 22% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Waltham Forest is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 79% approved vs 90% nationally.
