Five traveller pitches at Glyn Millwr Stones Houses, Blaina, Abertillery

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Blaenau Gwent Planning Committee on 29 Jan 2026.

P/2024/0223Refused

What was proposed

The application sought to retain an extension to a traveller site, providing five family pitches, a utility block, fencing, treatment plant and ecological works.

“Site Address: Land at Glyn Milwr, Stones Houses, Blaina, NP13 3AA Development: The retention of the use of land as an extension to the existing traveller’s site to accommodate five pitches for family members, to construct a communal utility room block, retention of timber fencing, installation of private treatment plant with access and ecological improvements.”

Officer report

The site and access

The site lies within the settlement boundary, beside wooded areas and homes, and is reached by a track linking to local walking routes.

“Site Context The application site lies within the settlement boundary as defined by the Blaenau Gwent Local Development Plan (LDP). It is located to the north of the existing travellers’ site and is bound by wooded areas. Beyond that, at an elevated level to the northeast, is Blaina Central Park. The western boundary is bound by vacant land (formerly Arosfa Day Centre) and a terrace of residential properties known as Sirhowy Villas.”

“Access to the site is to the south via a track which leads up off High Street to Stone’s Houses. The track also provides access to garages and some rear gardens of Stone’s Houses. The track is not wholly within the ownership of the applicant.”

Officer report

Earlier decisions and enforcement

An existing site was allowed on appeal in 2017, but a later five-pitch extension was refused and an enforcement notice was upheld.

“Background Members will be aware that planning permission was granted on appeal in 2017 for ‘the retention of material change of use of land to residential travellers site including siting of 3 static caravans, 4 touring caravans, associated hard standing, outbuildings, drainage, access and boundary treatments’. This appeal decision established the lawfulness of the existing site shown coloured in blue in the plan above.”

“An appeal against this Notice was lodged with PEDW (CAS-02445- W7P8Q6). The appeal was lodged on “ground (f)” - that the steps for compliance required by the notice were excessive. This appeal was dismissed on 16 th April 2024 i.e. the Notice was upheld.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended refusal because the proposal would more than double site capacity and create significant highway and pedestrian safety risks that could not be satisfactorily mitigated.

“The existing adopted highway from Filas Sirhywi/Sirhowy Villas and the access track serving the proposed residential site is sub-standard with regards to both highway design and construction and is unacceptable in terms of highway safety and capacity grounds. There are no pedestrian provisions and the access track and existing carriageway varies in width such that two vehicles cannot pass.”

Officer report

What residents said

Seven objections cited highway problems, noise, business activity, fires, anti-social behaviour, animals, drainage, environmental loss and safety concerns.

“The objections have been summarised below: - Unacceptable noise impacts from illicit scrap car activities and associated works, dogs barking and loud music. - The scale proposed is unacceptable, the concentration of so many caravans in a small area with all the business activity cannot be considered beneficial to the community. - Highway concerns: the access track is not adequate to take the increased amount of vehicle traffic including heavy vehicle movements.”

Officer report

The main planning balance

Officers gave significant weight to unmet traveller-pitch need and personal circumstances, but concluded these did not outweigh the highway safety concerns.

“The most recent GTAA acknowledges that there is a need for an additional 8 Gypsy Traveller pitches in the Borough which us unlikely to be met in the short term. Whilst a planning application may be submitted by the Council within the next 12 months to address some/all of the unmet need, there is uncertainty as to timescales and amount of development and as such limited weight should be given to this matter.”

Officer report

The committee vote

The committee voted unanimously to refuse planning permission, and the ward member did not take part in the vote.

“Upon a vote being taken, it was unanimously…”

“As a Ward Member for the application area, Councillor L. Winnett did not take part in the vote.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Blaenau Gwent Planning Committee minutes, 29 January 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Blaenau Gwent's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Thursday 29 January 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended refusal
Committee decided
Refused
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

8 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →