Sports facility improvements at Prairie Sports Village, Burnley
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Burnley Development Control Committee on 11 Jun 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought a new artificial grass pitch, improvements to an existing pitch, lighting, parking, access routes and related works.
“The application seeks full planning permission for a comprehensive package of improvements and extensions to the existing sports facilities at Prairie Sports Village. The proposal comprises the construction of a new artificial grass pitch (AGP), refurbishment and reconfiguration of an existing AGP, installation of associated fencing and floodlighting, provision of an overflow car park, new pedestrian access routes, alterations to the existing site access, and associated…”
“Works associated with the refurbished pitch include alterations to the perimeter fencing arrangement, retention of sections of the existing 4m high fencing, installation of new fencing where required, provision of a 1.2m high spectator barrier, revised access gates and extensions to existing goal storage facilities.”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The site is an established sports complex with pitches and facilities, located between residential areas, open fields, a marina, canal and railway infrastructure.
“The application site forms part of Prairie Sports Village, a well-established sports and recreation facility located off Windermere Avenue, Burnley. The wider site comprises a substantial area of open playing fields and associated sports infrastructure, including existing artificial grass pitches (AGPs), parking areas, changing facilities and ancillary recreational uses.”
“The site is characterised by open recreational land comprising playing fields and sports pitches, together with areas of hardstanding associated with the existing sports facilities. To the east, the site is bounded by established residential development fronting Colne Road and the surrounding residential streets of Reedley Grove, Holden Road and Highfield Avenue. To the west lies Reedley Marina, the Leeds and Liverpool Canal corridor and associated railway infrastructure.”
Officer report
Planning history and boundaries
Earlier permission established sporting infrastructure, and the cross-boundary proposal was also submitted to Pendle Borough Council.
“Relevant planning history includes planning permission APP/2018/0395, which granted consent for the creation of an artificial grass pitch, extension of the existing car park, provision of an overspill car park serving the golf driving range and associated alterations to the existing ball-stop netting.”
“The development is technically cross boundary (i.e., it relates to land in more than one local planning authority area). In such cases, the Planning Practice Guidance states that the applicant must submit identical applications to each local planning authority 1 . Accordingly, an identical application has been submitted to Pendle Borough Council under the planning reference: 26/0165/FUL.”
Officer report
The committee decision
The committee approved the application subject to conditions.
“That the application be approved subject to conditions.”
Minutes
Sources
- Burnley Development Control Committee minutes, 11 June 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Burnley's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Burnley
- Date
- Thursday 11 June 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Burnley committee decisions →
This committee's year
31 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.