Short-term let in a flat at PF3 42 Buchanan Street, Leith, Edinburgh
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee on 25 Mar 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought retrospective permission to change a residential flat into a short-term let, without physical changes.
“The change of use of the property to a short-term let (STL) will have an unacceptable impact on neighbouring amenity. The loss of the residential accommodation has not been justified. Whilst it is recognised that there is an economic benefit to the City as a whole from the provision of tourist accommodation, in this case it does not outweigh the adverse impact on residential amenity or the loss of residential accommodation.”
“The application is for the retrospective change of use of the property from a flatted dwelling to short term let (STL). No internal or external physical changes are proposed. The applicant indicates on the application form that the operation of the property as a short term let commenced on 06 July 2016.”
Officer report
The site
The property is a one-bedroom ground-floor flat in a four-storey tenement, within a mainly residential area and a conservation area.
“The application property is a ground floor flatted dwelling within a four-storey tenement. The property comprises one bedroom, shower room, kitchen, and living room. The approximate floor area of the property is 40.1 square metres.”
“The property is located within the Leith Conservation Area.”
Officer report
Earlier applications and enforcement
Two earlier applications were refused, an enforcement case was closed, and an appeal against the second refusal was dismissed.
“Enforcement History 21/00651/ESHORT Alleged unauthorised change of use from residential to short stay commercial visitor accommodation. Case closed 04 November 2021”
“Appeal to DPEA against application 24/04346/CLESTL, 28 February 2025. DPEA Reference: CLUD-230-2300 Status: Appeal Dismissed. Decision Date: 22 July 2025”
Officer report
Why the proposal was unacceptable
The use would increase movement, noise and servicing in a shared building, while the claimed economic benefits did not outweigh losing a home.
“The use of this property as an STL would introduce an increased frequency of movement to the property through the shared entrance and corridor, enabling visitors to arrive and stay at the premises for a short period of time on a regular basis throughout the year in a manner dissimilar to that of permanent residents.”
“To comply with the policy, it is not sufficient to demonstrate that the STL use will deliver economic benefits; rather, it must be demonstrated that the economic benefits associated with any individual application are significant enough that they warrant the loss of a home, and the economic and other benefits associated with this.”
Officer report
What people said
The objection concerned noise and disturbance, while supporters said there would be no effect on character or residential amenity.
“- Impact from increased noise and disturbance.”
“- No impact to surrounding character or residential amenity.”
Officer report
The committee’s decision
The committee refused planning permission for the reasons set out in the application’s refusal reasons.
“25/03843/FULSTL – Report by the Chief Planning Officer To REFUSE planning permission for the reasons set out in section C of the report by the Chief Planning Officer. 4.7 – 1 Coalhill, Edinburgh, EH6 6RH”
Minutes
Councillors at the meeting
- Hal OslerChairLib DemFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Max MitchellVice-ChairConservativeFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- David KeySNPFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Kevin LangLib DemFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Martha Mattos CoelhoSNPFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Amy McNeese-MechanSNPFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Joanna MowatConservativeFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Tim PogsonLabourFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Chas BoothSubstitute for MumfordGreenFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Cammy DaySubstitute for GriffithsLabourFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Alex StaniforthSubstitute for ParkerGreenFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
The minutes record this decision with no vote against, so each member present for this item is shown as voting for it.
Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.
Sources
- Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee minutes, 25 March 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Edinburgh's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Edinburgh
- Date
- Wednesday 25 March 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended refusal
- Committee decided
- Refused
- Councillors
- 11SNP 3Conservative 2Green 2Labour 2Lib Dem 2Show votes
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Edinburgh committee decisions →
This committee's year
201 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 5 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.