Variation of Condition 2 at Former Car Park, Park Road, Helmshore
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Rossendale Development Control Committee on 19 May 2026.
No officer report was published for this decision; this summary is from the committee minutes.
The planning application
The planning officer introduced the application with the submitted plans and location information.
“2026/0008 – Former Car Park, Park Road, Helmshore, Rossendale, Lancashire (ITEM B8) The Planning Officer introduced the application as detailed in the report including the site details, Title Drawing No.”
Minutes
Earlier site matters
Members noted that the development site had been used as a car park and that a concrete block wall had previously been approved.
“In determining the application, the Committee discussed the following: • Clarification on car parking spaces at side of the wall. • Applicant providing some spaces on outside of the development • Development site was used as a car park • Concrete block wall was approved previously…”
Minutes
The recommendation
The committee considered a proposal to approve the application in line with the officer’s recommendation, subject to conditions.
“A proposal was moved and seconded to approve in line with the Officer’s recommendation subject to the conditions detailed in the report and an additional condition around the proposal of the stone slip. The wording of the additional condition to be agreed between the Chair and the Head of Planning.”
Minutes
People who spoke
The agent spoke in favour of the application, and Councillor Hodgkiss spoke on it.
The decision
Approval was delegated to the Head of Planning and Building Control, subject to a suitable stone-slip sample, an updated condition and the listed conditions.
“Resolved: That Members delegate approval of the application to the Head of Planning & Building Control subject to receiving a suitable sample of the stone slips for the Park Road elevation of the retaining wall and updating Condition 1 with the details and subject to the following conditions:”
“- Submitted application form. - Location Plan (19-05-01-A) - Proposed Block Plan with Roof Plan (19-05-30-R) - Proposed Site Plan (462ROS-402C) - Proposed Ground Floor Plan (462ROS-405C) - Proposed First Floor Plans (462ROS-406B) - Proposed Second Floor Plans (462ROS-407B) - Proposed Elevations (100ROS-409D) - Proposed Landscape Plan (19-05-39-J) - Hydropave Tegula Block Paving Details - Refuse Truck Swept Path (3192-001) - Proposed Wall Treatment Park Road (19-05-39 J2) -…”
Minutes
Approval conditions
The conditions cover approved details, materials, landscaping, construction hours, ecology, drainage, contamination, access, parking and electric vehicle charging points.
“Prior to the occupation of any dwelling the parking area shown on the approved plans shall be constructed, laid out and surfaced in bound porous materials. The parking areas shall thereafter always remain available for the parking of domestic vehicles associated with the dwellings.”
“Prior to the occupation of any approved dwelling electric vehicle charging points shall be installed for each dwelling.”
Minutes
Conditions
Approved subject to 1 condition, set out in the minutes.
Sources
- Rossendale Development Control Committee minutes, 19 May 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Rossendale's committee minutes. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Rossendale
- Date
- Tuesday 19 May 2026
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Rossendale committee decisions →
This committee's year
42 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.