11 Cheltenham Road, Leyton, London, E10 6EU Data via plota.co.uk
Description
Prior approval for the construction of a single storey rear extension which would extend 6.00m beyond the rear wall of the existing dwelling, a maximum height of 3.00m and an eaves height of 3.00m. Data via plota.co.uk
Last checked
Site constraints 4
Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.
Every application in Waltham Forest - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.
Nearby new applications
486 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 9AH
Construction of a first-floor rear extension, mansard roof extension with front ...
3 Ely Road, Leyton, London, E10 6ER
Retention of use as a restaurant (Use Class E(b)) and alterations to the shopfro...
129 Matlock Road, Leyton, London, E10 6DJ
Demolition of the existing garage and ancillary structures and the construction ...
66 Sandringham Road, Leyton, London, E10 6HJ
Prior approval for the construction of a single storey rear extension which woul...
ATHAN BOYS CLUB, 119 - 121 Grove Road, Walthamstow, London, E17 9BU
Change of use from mixed use events hall and place of worship (Sui Generis) to c...
159 Farmer Road, Leyton, London, E10 5DJ
Construction of dormer roof extension to main rear roof, and roof extension abov...
Historical activity at this location
28 previous applications on record - archival context, not part of the live application.
Previous applications at this address
Nearby activity
Waltham Forest is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #80 out of 296. Only 22% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Waltham Forest is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 79% approved vs 90% nationally.
