Restaurant and events building at Grimshaw Lane, Chadderton, Oldham

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Oldham Planning Committee on 23 Sept 2026.

FUL/355490/25Approved

What was proposed

A two-storey commercial building would provide a ground-floor restaurant, a first-floor function and events space, parking, servicing, landscaping and a new Broadgate access.

“The application seeks full planning permission for the erection of a new two-storey multi-use commercial building comprising a buffet restaurant at ground floor level and a function and events space at first floor level.”

“The proposed building would occupy the north-western part of the site, broadly reflecting the position of the building approved under previous planning approval FUL/346977/21, with associated parking and servicing areas arranged around it. Access would be taken from Broadgate via a new vehicular entrance, with separate pedestrian access points also provided.”

Officer report

The site

The triangular vacant site lies beside Broadgate, Grimshaw Lane and the Rochdale Canal, with a pumping station, electricity infrastructure and business-area designation.

“The site is located adjacent to the junction of Broadgate and Grimshaw Lane, close to Middleton junction station. The site is triangular, and is bounded by Broadgate to the west, Grimshaw Lane to the north, and the Rochdale Canal (which is Special Area of Conservation (“SAC”), a Site of Special Scientific Interest (“SSSI”), and a site of Special Biological Importance (“SBI”).”

Officer report

Earlier permission

The site previously had permission for a general industrial building, service yard, parking and access, but that permission was not implemented.

“The proposal would redevelop a currently vacant parcel of land located within a Business and Employment Area (BEA). The site previously benefitted from planning permission under application FUL/346977/21 for a general industrial building with associated service yard, parking and access arrangements; however, that permission has not been implemented.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval because the development would reuse vacant employment land, support economic activity and provide an acceptable layout, appearance and environmental outcome subject to conditions.

“The development would deliver employment-generating commercial development to a site within a BEA that has been vacant for a significant period. Whilst the first-floor events space would not fall squarely within the individual use categories identified under Local Plan Policy 14, the building overall would operate as part of a single integrated commercial enterprise intrinsically linked to, and dependent upon, the ground-floor restaurant use.”

“The proposed layout, scale, appearance and landscaping are considered appropriate to the characteristics and constraints of the site. Subject to the recommended planning conditions, no objections have been raised in relation to highways, residential amenity, trees and landscaping, ecology, biodiversity net gain, flood risk and drainage, ground conditions, coal mining risk, or energy.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

The consultees raised no objections, with some requesting conditions covering highways, ecology, drainage, utilities, lighting, access and construction measures.

“Greater Manchester Ecology Unit No objection subject to conditions relating to bat box provision, external lighting and precautionary methods of working. Comments are discussed…”

“TfGM has reviewed the submitted Transport Assessment and advises that the traffic impact of the development would be negligible, with junctions operating within capacity. No objection is raised, subject to the implementation of appropriate access, parking, active travel measures and a Travel Plan.”

Officer report

Public representations

No representations were received about the application.

“In accordance with the requirements of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, and the Council’s adopted Statement of Community Involvement, the application has been advertised by way of site notices and a press notice. No representations have been received on the application.”

Officer report

Committee consideration

The committee took the information in the Late List into consideration when reaching its decision.

“In reaching its decision, the Committee took into consideration the information as set out in the Late List attached at Item 12.”

Minutes

The vote and decision

The application was moved and seconded for approval, unanimously supported, and granted subject to the stated conditions.

“It was MOVED by Councillor Iqbal and SECONDED by Councillor Harkness that the application be APPROVED.”

“RESOLVED: That the application be GRANTED subject to the conditions as outlined in the report.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Oldham Planning Committee minutes, 23 September 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Oldham's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Oldham
Date
Wednesday 23 September 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
Unanimous
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

27 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 4 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →