Lawful development certificate at 467 Archer Road, Stevenage
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Stevenage Planning and Development Committee on 12 Feb 2026, in a recorded vote.
What was proposed
The application sought a lawful development certificate for internal alterations to the dwelling and changes to its windows and doors.
“Proposal : Lawful Development Certificate (Proposed) for internal alterations to dwelling and alterations to fenestration.”
Officer report
The site
The site is a two-storey terraced home in a mainly residential Radburn-style group on Archer Road.
“DC88 6 SITE DESCRIPTION 1.1 The application site comprises a two storey, terraced property within a predominantly residential area of Stevenage. It is located on the western side of Archer Road, within Radburn style cluster of homes. 7 RELEVANT PLANNING HISORY 2.1 Planning application 99/00235/FP had sought permission for a ‘single storey front extension’, which had been granted in August 1999.”
Officer report
Earlier planning history
A front extension was approved in 1999, and prior approval was not required for a larger rear extension in 2024.
“Planning application 24/00408/HPA had been submitted to confirm that prior approval is not required for a “single storey rear extension which will extend beyond the rear wall of the original house by 4.65 metres, for which the maximum height will be 4.00 meters and the height of the eaves will be 3.00 meters”. A decision issued in July 2024 confirmed that prior approval is not required.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended issuing the certificate because the external changes met permitted development criteria and the internal works were not development.
“Therefore, following an assessment of the proposal, it has been determined that it accords with the criterion set out in Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Permitted Development Order. Therefore, the proposed works do not require planning permission…”
“DC88 and would be classed as permitted development. Given planning permission is not required, the Council cannot legally assess the proposed development against the Council’s adopted Local Plan (2019) or relevant guidance on design as defined in the Design Guide SPD (2025).”
Officer report
The main legal issue
The proposed occupation by the owner and up to two lodgers was not considered a material change of use or an HMO.
“The internal alterations to the floor plan (once the development as per the application 24/00408/HPA has been built) are not considered to constitute development as defined by the act referenced in paragraph 6.1.3. The application form states that these alterations are to accommodate two separate rooms for up to two potential lodgers, with the applicant to remain in the home.”
“The Government has released the following regulations as per their website, whereby renting out rooms to 2 or less people in a dwelling as a resident landlord (buildings occupied by owners) would not constitute a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO). https://www.gov.uk/rent-room-in-your-home/houses-in-multiple-occupation.”
Officer report
Consultation and representations
There was no statutory requirement to consult adjoining neighbours or other consultees for this lawful development certificate application.
“10 CONSULTATIONS 10.1 As this application is a lawful development certificate under in Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (Amendment) (England) Order 2015 (as amended), there is no statutory requirement to consult any consultees. 11 RELEVANT PLANNING LEGISLATION & ASSESSMENT 6.1 Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (Amendment) (England) Order 2015 (as amended).”
Officer report
What members discussed
Members asked whether the property footprint would change, and officers confirmed that the current application did not alter the previously approved footprint.
“Members sought clarification on whether the footprint of the property would be altered as part of the current application. The presenting officer confirmed that prior approval on the extension had previously been granted in 2024 to enlarge the property. The Officer advised that the current application related solely to internal alterations and did not propose any changes to the approved footprint.”
Minutes
The committee vote
The recorded vote was ten votes for, with no votes against or abstentions; four councillors were absent.
“For – Councillors Julie Ashley-Wren, Stephen Booth, Robert Boyle, Peter Clark, Coleen De Freitas, Lynda Guy, Rob Henry, Claire Parris, Ellie Plater and Carolina Veres Against – 0 Abstentions – 0 Absent – Councillors Kamal Choudhury, Forhad Chowdhury, Akin Elekolusi and Nigel Williams…”
Minutes
The decision
The committee issued the lawful development certificate, subject to the approved plans and confirmation that the works did not require planning permission.
“A recorded vote* was taken on the application and it was RESOLVED that the Lawful Development Certificate is issued subject to the following conditions:”
“2 Following an assessment of the proposal, it has been determined that it accords with the criteria set out in Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (Amendment) (England) Order 2015 (as amended). Therefore, the proposed works do not require planning permission and would be classed as permitted development.”
Minutes
Councillors at the meeting
- Claire ParrisChairLab Co-opFor
- Carolina VeresVice-ChairLab Co-opFor
- Julie Ashley-WrenLib DemFor
- Peter ClarkLab Co-opFor
- Coleen De FreitasLab Co-opFor
- Lynda GuyLab Co-opFor
- Rob HenryREF UKFor
- Ellie PlaterLab Co-opFor
- Stephen BoothLib DemFor
- Robert BoyleLabourFor
Source: Plota analysis of the council's record of attendance; parties from the council's list of councillors.
Sources
- Stevenage Planning and Development Committee minutes, 12 February 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Stevenage's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Stevenage
- Date
- Thursday 12 February 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- 10 for, 0 against (recorded vote)
- Councillors
- 10Lab Co-op 6Lib Dem 2Labour 1REF UK 1Show votes
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Stevenage committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
20 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.