Sutton Coldfield Sea Cadets,Stonehouse Road,Sutton Coldfield,Birmingham,B73 6LH Data via plota.co.uk

2026/03411/PA - Variation of Condition REGISTERED: Under Assessment

Proposal

Removal of Conditions 3 (Surface Water Drainage) and 4 (Operation and Maintenance of Sustainable Drainage System) and variation of Condition 2 (Approved Plans) attached to planning permission , approved on 12/02/2024, for the demolition of existing shipbuilding and temporary buildings and the construction of a new land-based shipbuilding facility together with site-wide external works Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
22 Jun 2026
✓
Validated
23 Jun 2026
Decision
Expected by 18 Aug 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. A decision is expected by 18 Aug 2026.

The consultation period closed on 1 Sept 2026.

Documents 16

All documents on the council site ↗

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    Fullcouncil archive

    Conditions variation sought for 2, 3, 4

    • VariationRemoval of Conditions 3 (Surface Water Drainage) and 4 (Operation and Maintenance…This application2026/03411/PA

Site constraints 10

Green belt: Birmingham
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Registered park or garden: Sutton Park
Nationally designated heritage. Its significance and setting carry great weight.
Registered parks and gardens, battlefields, world heritage sites and protected wrecks are designated heritage assets: harm needs clear and convincing justification.
Historic England ↗
Article 4 direction
City Wide Hmo. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
National nature reserve 21 m away: Sutton Park
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Air quality management area: Birmingham AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
SSSI 21 m away: Sutton Park SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Scheduled monument 91 m away: Medieval deerpark and other archaeological remains in Sutton Park
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Nationally important archaeology protected by the Secretary of State. Work that affects the monument or its setting is rarely permitted.
Historic England ↗
Habitat network: Other Priority Habitats - NEZ
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Nature improvement area: Birmingham and the Black Country; Priority habitat 4 m away: No main habitat but additional habitats present.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Birmingham - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Birmingham
Application type
Variation of Condition
Postcode
B73 6LH
Received
22 Jun 2026
Validated
23 Jun 2026
Ward
Sutton Vesey
Case officer
Show
Applicant
Show
Agent
CoARC

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
30 Jul 2026
Comments by
1 Sept 2026
Statutory expiry
22 Sept 2026
Birmingham
Planning Authority Score
2.2/10
Poor
#265 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Birmingham is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #245 out of 296. 47% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (86%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Birmingham decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
82%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #244 of 296
86%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #240 of 296
48%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #245 of 296
47%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #205 of 296
71%
Minor dwellings approved
98 decided (1-9 homes)
94%
Major dwellings approved
33 decided (10+ homes)
56%
Change of use approved
261 decided
3,472
Total decisions
619 refused in the year to March 2026