Beehive Farm, Maddox Lane, Bookham, Leatherhead, Surrey, KT23 3HT Data via plota.co.uk

MO/2026/01064 - Variance of Conditions Refused

Proposal

Variation of Conditions 3, 11 and 13 of planning permission MO/2026/00362 for the 'Variation of Condition 2 of approved planning application for the erection of replacement dwelling following demolition of existing bungalow to allow an amendment to the roof shape, fenestration changes and the number and arrangement of solar panels', to allow for a GRAF rainwater harvesting tank, changing the shape of the attenuation trench to be amended, levels of surface water drainage to be raised, submission of external materials, and details relating to zero carbon readiness. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
29 Jun 2026
✗
Refused
16 Sept 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 16 Sept 2026 · Delegated · Last checked 24 Sept 2026

Associated applications 4

Site constraints 7

Special protection area
Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm.
Priority habitat: Traditional orchard
A habitat of principal importance. It shapes the ecology work and the biodiversity net gain a scheme has to show.
SSSI 77 m away: Bookham Commons SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Habitat network: Traditional orchards
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Special protection areaCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Also on the record
Inside the Great Bookham and Fetcham built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 4, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 24 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Mole Valley - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Variance of Conditions
Postcode
KT23 3HT
Received
29 Jun 2026
Validated
29 Jun 2026
Ward
Bookham West
Parish
Non Parish Area
Case officer
Show
Target decision
24 Aug 2026
Decision
REFUSE
Decision date
16 Sept 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP/2026/00931
Comments by
1 Sept 2026
Committee
27 Jul 2026
Statutory expiry
24 Aug 2026
Env. assessment
No
Mole Valley
Planning Authority Score
2.1/10
Poor
#270 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Mole Valley is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #240 out of 296. Mole Valley is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 76% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 76% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Mole Valley decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
72%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #291 of 296
76%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #291 of 296
50%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #240 of 296
43%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #172 of 296
47%
Minor dwellings approved
114 decided (1-9 homes)
71%
Major dwellings approved
7 decided (10+ homes)
93%
Change of use approved
15 decided
913
Total decisions
259 refused in the year to March 2026