Short-term let flat at 20 Jameson Place, Edinburgh
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee on 30 Sept 2026.
What was proposed
Retrospective permission was sought to change a residential flat into short-term let accommodation, with no physical changes proposed.
“The application is for a change of use from flatted residential to short term let (sui generis). No internal or external physical changes are proposed. The property has been used for short term let since July 2024. The application is therefore retrospective.”
Officer report
The site
The property is a three-bedroom ground-floor flat in a residential tenement, with its own entrance and a shared rear garden.
“The application property is a three-bedroom, ground floor flat located within a four- storey tenement at 20 Jameson Place, off Leith Walk. The property has its own main door access and there is a communal garden to the rear.”
“Jameson Place is predominantly residential, and the application property is on the south side. On the north side, but towards Leith Walk to the west, is Lorne Primary School. At the end of the street to the east is a sheltered housing complex. Jameson Place is a cul-de-sac with no through route for vehicles.”
Officer report
Earlier application
An earlier retrospective application for the same change of use was refused in January 2026.
“25/01417/FULSTL 20 Jameson Place Leith Edinburgh EH6 8PB Retrospective Change of Use of Premises to Short Term Let Accommodation. Refused 23 January 2026”
Officer report
Officers’ recommendation
Officers recommended refusal because the proposal would harm neighbouring amenity and had not justified losing residential accommodation.
“The change of use of this property to a short term let (STL) will have an unacceptable impact on neighbouring amenity. The loss of the residential accommodation has not been justified. Whilst it is recognised that there is an economic benefit to the City as a whole from the provision of tourist accommodation, in this case it does not outweigh the adverse impact on residential amenity or the loss of residential accommodation.”
“The proposal does not comply with the Development Plan Policy NPF 4 policy 30(e) and LDP Policy Hou 6. There are no material considerations that outweigh this conclusion. The proposal is unacceptable.”
Officer report
Main planning concerns
Visitors and servicing could increase disturbance, while the claimed economic benefits did not outweigh the effects on amenity and housing.
“The additional servicing that operating a property as an STL requires compared to that of a residential use is also likely to result in an increase in disturbance, further impacting on neighbouring amenity. However, this would be of lesser impact as it is likely that servicing would be conducted during the daytime.”
“To comply with the policy, it is not sufficient to demonstrate that the STL use will deliver economic benefits; rather, it must be demonstrated that the economic benefits associated with any individual application are significant enough that they warrant the loss of a home, and the economic and other benefits associated with this.”
Officer report
Public views
There were 39 objections and 21 supporting comments, with concerns about amenity, housing and policy alongside support for economic benefits and licensing.
“A total of 60 representations have been received. These are 39 objections, including one petition objecting with 18 signatories. There are 21 comments in support. An objection has been received from Leith Community Council.”
“- Brings economic benefits. - There will be no negative impact on residential amenity. - The STL use will comply with licensing requirements.”
Officer report
The committee’s decision
Planning permission was refused for the reasons set out in the officer report.
“26/02101/FULSTL - Report by the Chief Planning Officer To REFUSE planning permission for the reasons set out in section C of the report by the Chief Planning Officer. 4.3 – 1F3 98 Montgomery Street, Edinburgh, EH7 5HE”
Minutes
Councillors at the meeting
- Hal OslerChairLib Dem
- Max MitchellVice-ChairConservative
- Christopher CowdyConservative
- Joan GriffithsLabour
- David KeySNP
- Martha Mattos CoelhoSNP
- Amy McNeese-MechanSNP
- Tim PogsonLabour
- Euan DavidsonSubstitute for LangLib Dem
- Alys MumfordSubstitute for StaniforthGreen
- Ben ParkerSubstitute for BoothGreen
Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.
Sources
- Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee minutes, 30 September 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Edinburgh's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Edinburgh
- Date
- Wednesday 30 September 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended refusal
- Committee decided
- Refused
- Councillors
- 11SNP 3Conservative 2Green 2Labour 2Lib Dem 2Show councillors
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Edinburgh committee decisions →
This committee's year
268 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 4 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.