Rosings Hundall Apperknowle Dronfield S18 4BS Data via plota.co.uk

25/00223/FLH - FULL HOUSEHOLDER Refused

Proposal

Proposed 2 storey front extension with PD Right A,B,C,D and E removed. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
19 Mar 2025
✓
Validated
4 Apr 2025
✓
Consultation
8 Apr 2025
✗
Refused
4 Jul 2025
✗
Appeal dismissed
21 Aug 2025

Refused on 4 Jul 2025 · Committee · Last checked 15 Oct 2026

Planning committee

Decided by North East Derbyshire Planning Committee on 24 Jun 2025.

Refused

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised refusal because the extension would be disproportionate Green Belt development without very special circumstances outweighing the harm.
  • The committee voted to refuse permission, citing disproportionate cumulative additions and the absence of very special circumstances.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site history, officers’ assessment, representations, speakers, debate, vote and reasons for refusal. Includes the meeting recording

Source: Plota analysis of North East Derbyshire's committee minutes of 24 Jun 2025.

Documents 20

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 4

Green belt: South and West Yorkshire
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 4. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Radon affected area, class 5
An estimated 10 to 30% of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Also on the record
Coalfield, development low risk area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 2 November 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in North East Derbyshire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
FULL HOUSEHOLDER
Postcode
S18 4BS
Received
19 Mar 2025
Validated
4 Apr 2025
Ward
Unstone Ward
Parish
Unstone Parish
Case officer
Show
Target decision
30 May 2025
Decision
REFUSED
Decision date
4 Jul 2025
Decision level
Committee
Appeal
Dismissed · 21 Aug 2025 · Written Representations · Inspectorate case 3369308 ↗
Applicant
Show
Agent
AP Building Design

How this decision compares

Decided in 91 days from validation, 35 days slower than North East Derbyshire's median of 56 for householder applications. Refused, as 11% of householder applications here are.

54%decided within 8 weeks
89%approved
164decided in the last year

Plota live figures for householder applications decided by North East Derbyshire in the last twelve months, from validation. North East Derbyshire decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Neighbours
12 Jun 2025
Consultation
8 Apr 2025
Comments by
6 May 2025
Site or press notice
15 Apr 2025
Committee
24 Jun 2025
Statutory expiry
30 May 2025
Env. assessment
No
North East Derbyshire
Planning Authority Score
4.6/10
Below average
#168 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

North East Derbyshire ranks #166 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (93%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
North East Derbyshire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #89 of 296
93%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #133 of 296
62%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #166 of 296
44%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #181 of 296
87%
Minor dwellings approved
45 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
8 decided (10+ homes)
82%
Change of use approved
28 decided
532
Total decisions
42 refused in the year to March 2026