Amenity land, Devonhurst Place, Chiswick, W4 4JE Data via plota.co.uk

P/2026/1394 - Works to Trees in Conservation Area Approved

Proposal

Works to trees in a Conservation Area. T1. Robinia pseudoacacia. Reduce back to previous points of reduction and by approximately 4-5 metres. T2. Pine group. (Group of 3 trees forming 1 canopy). Reduce lateral branches by up to 2 metres to balance asymmetric crown, with no change to overall height of group. Remove deadwood and crossing branches to tidy. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
8 May 2026
✓
Validated
26 May 2026
✓
Approved
2 Jul 2026

Approved on 2 Jul 2026 · Last checked 19 Sept 2026

Site constraints 12

11 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: 12 and 13, Heathfield Terrace W4, Grade II, about 3 m from the postcode pin · 11 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 11 with distances
Historic England ↗
Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Turnham Green conservation area
Also Turnham Green. Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Article 4 direction
Dwellinghouses (C3) to small HMOs (C4) - borough-wide Article 4 Direction. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Air quality management area: Hounslow AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
National infrastructure project about 694 m away: Thames Tideway Tunnel
The site is about 694 m from the project boundary. Waste water treatment, decided. The project page says whether consent was granted.
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Also on the record
Local nature reserve about 367 m away: Gunnersbury Triangle; Inside the Hounslow built-up area; Public transport access: PTAL 4 (good), TfL 2023, for the 100 m square; Town centre about 8 m away: Chiswick; Designated open space about 24 m away; Open access land about 27 m away: Access Land - Combined Open Country, Registered Common Land and Section 16 Dedicated Land.
Not affected
Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 2 November 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, Transport for London (public transport access levels, Powered by TfL Open Data, OGL v3.0, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Hounslow - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Hounslow
Application type
Works to Trees in Conservation Area
Postcode
W4 4JE
Received
8 May 2026
Validated
26 May 2026
Ward
Chiswick Gunnersbury
Case officer
Show
Decision
No Objection
Decision date
2 Jul 2026
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 37 days from validation, 12 days slower than Hounslow's median of 25 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 99% of tree and landscaping works here are.

99%decided within 8 weeks
99%approved
500decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Hounslow in the last twelve months, from validation. Hounslow decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
1 Jun 2026
Comments by
1 Jun 2026
Statutory expiry
7 Jul 2026
Hounslow
Planning Authority Score
2.1/10
Poor
#268 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Hounslow is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #203 out of 296. 47% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Hounslow is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 75% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 75% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Hounslow decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
71%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #294 of 296
75%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #293 of 296
56%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #203 of 296
47%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #208 of 296
38%
Minor dwellings approved
82 decided (1-9 homes)
93%
Major dwellings approved
14 decided (10+ homes)
29%
Change of use approved
72 decided
1,191
Total decisions
340 refused in the year to March 2026