Maintenance and storage building at Land to the rear of 50 Sutton Mill Road, Potton
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Central Bedfordshire Development Management Committee on 6 May 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought permission for a maintenance and storage building for plant and machinery, partly retaining an existing building.
“The Application: The application seeks planning permission for the erection of a maintenance and storage building for plant and machinery. Since the submission of the application, the proposals have been amended to reduce the scale of the building to overcome prevailing concerns relating to siting and scale. The amendments have reduced the length of the building to 10m (a reduction of 3.1m) and the height of the building to 3m (a reduction of 1.7m).”
Officer report
Officers’ assessment
Officers considered the reduced building, stated maintenance need, native planting and planning conditions overcame previous concerns and supported approval.
“Paragraph 6.10 states that the applicant is responsible for 159,511 sqm of land within the quarry, 87, 570 sqm of which consists of woodland which is to be maintained. Given the significant scale of maintenance required, it is considered that there would be suitable justification for the proposed building.”
“It is considered that a Lawful Development Certificate would be required to confirm the lawful use of the land for any other purpose. 1.9It is considered that while the location of the proposed development would be within the open countryside, suitable justification for its location has been provided and its use (and associated restrictions) could be secured via a planning condition.”
Officer report
Design and local impact
Reducing the building’s height and size, changing its colour and adding native planting were considered sufficient to reduce countryside and residential visual impact.
“2.7Following amendments to reduce its overall size, it is considered that the scale of the building would now be acceptable. The height of the building has been significantly lowered thereby reducing the building's prominence within the open countryside and the nearby residential estate. The Inspector raised some concern regarding the appearance of the building and specifically its materiality being ‘somewhat unfortunate’.”
“3.2It is considered that proposal will not result in a harmful overbearing impact, loss of light, or loss of privacy to existing occupiers, given the separation distances involved. 3.3The Council's Public Protection Officer has requested a condition that the proposed use of the site would not exceed existing background sound levels.”
Officer report
The committee vote
Nine members voted for approval, with none voting against and none abstaining.
“That the application be APPROVED subject to: 1. The conditions set out in the Officers report; and 2. An amendment to condition 4 to ensure the existing landscaping is maintained and managed…”
“On being put to the vote 9 Members voted to approve the item, 0 members voted against approval and 0 members abstained.”
Minutes
Councillors at the meeting
- David BlighChairLib Dem
- Hayley WhitakerVice-ChairIndependent
- Nick AndrewsLabour
- Sue ClarkConservative
- Susan ClinchGreen
- Russell GoodchildIndependent
- Kevin PugheLib Dem
- Richard WenhamConservative
- Tracey WyeIndependent
- Nigel YoungConservative
Apologies Anthony Brown Conservative, John Gurney Independent, Vicky Malone Independent
Also attending Rebecca Hares Independent
Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.
Sources
- Central Bedfordshire Development Management Committee minutes, 6 May 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Central Bedfordshire's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Central Bedfordshire
- Date
- Wednesday 6 May 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- 9 for, 0 against
- Councillors
- 10Conservative 3Independent 3Lib Dem 2Green 1Labour 1Show councillors
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Central Bedfordshire committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.